IS THERE AN ENVIRONMENTAL KUZNETS CURVE IN WESTERN BALKANS: EXAMINING EDUCATION-TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION-CO2 EMISSIONS

Eighth International Scientific Conference Contemporary Issues in Economics, Business and Management [EBM 2024], [pp. 289-303]

AUTHOR(S) / AUTOR(I): Marija Petrović-Ranđelović , Snežana Radukić , Žarko Popović 

Download Full Pdf   

DOI: 10.46793/EBM24.289PR

ABSTRACT / SAŽETAK:

In the period after 2000, the Western Balkans countries significantly improved their development performance and realized benefits from the increase in per capita income. However, the region today faces complex environmental challenges, because of the fact that economic development in these countries is associated with a growing environmental impact. Raising concerns about the growth patterns sustainability in the context of global environmental challenge require coordinated regional efforts and significant investment in adapting and mitigating the impact of harmful environmental practices in order to build resilient and sustainable economies. In this context, the question of the existence of an Environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) in the countries of the Western Balkan region, that is, the existence of an inverted U-shaped relationship between per capita income and environmental quality, arises. Increasing awareness of climate change and the need for sustainable development give the importance of education and technological innovation in reducing CO2 emissions. For this reason, this study examines the relationship between the education and technological innovation and CO2 emissions in the Western Balkan countries over the period 2002- 2022 employing an econometric model based on the panel data for these countries. The findings revealed a positive correlation between education and the reduction of CO2 emissions, while the impact of technological innovations varies depending on the type of technologies used, suggesting that EKC hypothesis is valid in the countries in region. In order to achieve environmental objectives and achieving green economic growth, the authorities of the Western Balkan countries must pursue the strategies for mitigating the CO2 emissions through educational and technological investments.

KEYWORDS / KLJUČNE REČI:

Education, Technological innovations, CO2 emissions, Environmental Kuznets curve, Western Balkan countries

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT / PROJEKAT:

The paper is the result of research in accordance with the Decision of the Ministry of Science, Technological Development and Innovation on the transfer of funds for financing scientific research work in 2024, number 451-03-65/2024-03, dated January 26, 2024.

REFERENCES / LITERATURA:

  • Ahmad, M., Işık, C., Jabeen, G., Ali, T., Ozturk, I., & Atchike, D. W. (2021). Heterogeneous links among urban concentration, non-renewable energy use intensity, economic development, and environmental emissions across regional development levels. Science of the Total Environment, 765, 144527. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33412378/
  • Alkhateeb, T. T. Y., Mahmood, H., Altamimi, N. N., & Furqan, M. (2020) Role of education and economic growth on the CO2 emissions in Saudi Arabia, Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 8(2), 15-209, http://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2020.8.2(12)
  • Alola, A. A., & Ozturk, I. (2021). Mirroring risk to investment within the EKC hypothesis in the  United  States.  Journal  of  Environmental  Management,  293,  112890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112890
  • Balado-Naves, R., Baños-Pino, J. F., & Mayor, M. (2018). Do countries influence neighbouring pollution? A spatial analysis of the EKC for CO2 emissions. Energy Policy,123, 266–279. https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v123y2018icp266- 279.html
  • Balaguer, J., & Cantavella, M. (2018). The role of education in the Environmental Kuznets Curve.  Evidence  from  Australian  data.  Energy  Economics,  70,  289-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.01.021
  • Carrion-Flores, C. E., & Innes, R. (2010). Environmental innovation and environmental performance. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 59(1), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2009.05.003.
  • Chen, Y., & Lee, C. C. (2020). Does technological innovation reduce CO2 emissions? Cross country evidence. Journal of Cleaner Production, 263, 121550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121550.
  • Dauda, L., Long, X., Mensah, C. N., Salman, M., Boamah, K. B., Ampon-Wireko, S., &Kofi Dogbe, C. S. (2021). Innovation, trade openness and CO2 emissions in selected countries in Africa. Journal of Cleaner Production, 281, 125143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125143
  • Đukić, V., Đukić, O., & Đukić, B. (2019). Obrazovanje u funkciji održivog razvoja (Education as a function of sustainable development). Zbornik radova Mediji i ekonomija (Proceedings Media and economy), 5.  https://doisrpska.nub.rs/index.php/ZMES/issue/view/753
  • Eyuboglu, K., & Uzar, U. (2021). A new perspective to environmental degradation: The linkages between higher education and CO2 emissions. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(1), 482–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09414-8.
  • Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1991a). Environmental impacts of the North American Free Trade Agreement. NBER Working paper 3914. https://doi.org/10.3386/w3914
  • Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995b). Economic-growth and the environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 110(2), 353–377. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118443.
  • Jiang, Q., Khattak, S. I., & Rahman, Z. U. (2021). Measuring the simultaneous effects of electricity consumption and production on carbon dioxide emissions (CO2e) in China: new evidence from an EKC-based assessment. Energy, 229, 120616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.120616
  • Kuznets, S. (1995). Economic growth and income inequality. American Economic Review, 45, 1–28. https://assets.aeaweb.org/asset-server/files/9438.pdf
  • Li, W., Yang, G., & Li, X. (2019). Modeling the evolutionary nexus between carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth. Journal of Cleaner Production, 215, 1191-1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.100
  • Li, X., & Ullah, S. (2022). Caring for the environment: How CO2 emissions respond to human capital in BRICS economies? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(12), 18036–18046. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17025-0
  • Mongo, M., Belaïd, F., & Ramdani, B. (2021). The effects of environmental innovations on CO2 emissions: Empirical evidence from Europe. Environmental Science & Policy, 118, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.12.004.
  • Moutinho, V., Varum, C., & Madaleno, M. (2017). How economic growth affects emissions? An investigation of the Environmental Kuznets curve in portuguese and spanish economic activity sectors. Energy Policy, 106: 326-344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.069
  • Nasir, M., A., Canh, N., P., Lan Le, T. N. (2021). Environmental degradation & role of financialisation, economic development, industrialisation and trade liberalization. Journal of Environmental Management, 277, 111471.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111471
  • Pham, N. M., Huynh, T. L. D., & Nasir, M. A. (2020) Environmental consequences of population, affluence and technological progress for European countries: a Malthusian view. Journal of Environmental Management, 260, 110143.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110143
  • Shields, R. (2019). The sustainability of international higher education: Student mobility and global climate change. Journal of Cleaner Production, 217: 594-602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.291
  • Thompson, A. (2012). Water abundance and an EKC for water pollution. Economic Letters, 117(2), 423–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2012.06.014
  • Wang, Z., & Zhu, Y. (2020). Do energy technology innovations contribute to CO2 emissions abatement? A spatial perspective. Science of The Total Environment, 726, 138574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138574
  • World Bank (2024). World Development Indicators. Retrieved 10 November 2024 from: https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators
  • Xie, Q., Xu, X., & Liu, X. (2019). Is there an EKC between economic growth and smog pollution in China? New evidence from semiparametric spatial autoregressive models. Journal of Cleaner Production, 220, 873–883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.166
  • Xin, Y., Yang, S., & Rasheed, M. F. (2023). Exploring the impacts of education and unemployment on CO2 emissions. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 36(2), 2110139. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2110139
  • Yang, G., Sun, T., Wang, J., & Li, X. (2015). Modeling the nexus between carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth. Energy Policy, 86, 104-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.06.031
  • Zafar, M. W., Saleem, M. M., Destek, M. A., & Caglar, A. E. (2022). The dynamic linkage between remittances, export diversification, education, renewable energy consumption, economic growth, and CO2 emissions in top remittance-receiving countries. Sustainable Development, 30(1), 165–175. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2236
  • Zhang, C., Khan, I., Dagar, V., Saeed, A., & Zafar, M. W. (2022). Environmental impact of information and communication technology: Unveiling the role of education in developing countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 178(C), 121570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121570.
  • Zi, C., Jie, W., & Hong-Bo, C. (2016). CO2 emissions and urbanization correlation in China based on threshold analysis. Ecological Indicators, 61:193–201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.09.013