58. KONGRES ANTROPOLOŠKOG DRUŠTVA SRBIJE (ADS 2025), [pp. 26-33]
AUTHOR(S) / AUTOR(I): Dragana Zgonjanin
, Eida Almohammed
, Dragan Obradović
, Rashed Alghafri 
Download Full Pdf
DOI: 10.46793/ADS25.26Z
ABSTRACT / SAŽETAK:
Various forensic techniques are used to identify a human corpse, depending on the circumstances and the state of remains. Unfortunately, the standard forensic identification methods were not sufficient in 30 to 35 % of all victims, therefore DNA identification was necessary. Since the beginning of our work in 2003, our laboratory has focused exclusively on STR DNA from bone, a powerful tool in missing person cases. 92% of skeletal remains analyzed were samples submitted for body identifications by law enforcement and only 8% were samples submitted to answer family identity or historical questions. In order to expand DNA typing capabilities on challenging samples such as bones, teeth, poorly preserved corpses, such as those found in water, buried or burned; modifications were introduced in protocols Phenol Chloroform Isoamyl Alcohol (PCIA) Extraction methods – organic extraction method and extraction PrepFiler® BTA Forensic DNA Extraction Kit (Applied Biosystems) enabled obtaining profiles in 98% cases. We have followed the standardization process used in Europe and therecommendations of the European Network of Forensic Science Institutes (ENFSI) for adoption of new genetic markers through the application of new STR multiplex systems in the DNA analysis. In this paper we have presented 30 bone samples of skeletal remains from routine casework submitted for body identifications by law enforcement, which were analyzed through the application of new STR multiplex system using Investigator® 24plex QS kit and GlobalFiler™ PCR Amplification kit, previously analyzed AmpFLSTR® Identifiler® Plus kit. Advanced extraction and purification techniques, together with more sensitive and robust new amplification kits allowed us to overcome the challenges associated with processing compromised skeletal remains and ultimately obtain full STR DNA profiles in 99% of the bones.
KEYWORDS / KLJUČNE REČI:
Skeletal remains; DNA typing; Human identification; Forensic identification; DNA extraction
REFERENCES / LITERATURA:
- Albinsson, L., Noren, L., Hedell, R. (2011). Swedish population data and concordance for the kits PowerPlex® ESX 16 System, PowerPlex® ESI 16 System AmpFlSTR1 NGMTM, AmpFlSTR1 SGMTM Plus and Investigator ESSplex. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 5 e89–92.
- Almohammed, E., Zgonjanin, D., Iyengar, A., Ballard, D., Devesse, L., Sibte, H. (2017). A study of degraded skeletal samples using ForenSeq DNA Signature™ Kit. Forensic Sci Int: Genet Suppl Ser 6:e410–e412.
- Almohammed, E., Zgonjanin, D., Sibte, H. (2019). A study of skeletal remains using GlobalFiler™. Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series. Vol. 7, ISSUE 1, P897-900.
- Cattaneo, C., DiMartino, S., Scali, S., Craig, O., Grandi, M., Sokol, R. (1999). Determining the human origin of fragments of burnt bone: a comparative study of histological, immunological, and DNA techniques. Forensic Sci Int 102:181–191.
- Edson, H.A., Thew, H.A., Damann, F.E., Boyer, C.A., Barritt-Ross, S.M., Smith, B.C. (2005). Success rates for recovering mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) from 4000 “ancient” human skeletal remains, Proceedings of The 17th Meeting of the International Association of Forensic Sciences, August 21–26 2005; Hong Kong, A0606. In: Philip SL Beh (Ed.) Hong Kong: International Association of Forensic Sciences/Hong Kong Forensic Science Society, 2005, pp. 58.
- Gill, P., Ivanov, PL., Kimpton, C., Piercy, R., Benson, N., Tully, G., Evett, I., Hagelberg, E., Sullivan, K. (1994). Identification of the remains of the Romanov family by DNA analysis. Nat Genet 6:130–135.
- Hagelberg, E., Sykes, B., Hedges, R. (1989). Ancient bone DNA amplified. Nature 342:485.
- Hagelberg, E., Gray, IC., Jeffreys, AJ. (1991). Identification of the skeletal remains of a murder victim by DNA analysis. Nature 352:427–429.
- Hochmeister, MN., Budowle, B., Borer, UV., Eggmann, U., Comey, CT., Dirnhofer, R. (1991). Typing of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) extracted from compact bone from human remains. J Forensic Sci 36:1649–1661.
- Holland, MM., Fisher, DL., Mitchell, LG., Rodriquez, WC., Canik, JJ., Merril, CR et al. (1993). Mitochondrial DNA sequence analysis of human skeletal remains: Identification of remains from the Vietnam War. J Forensic Sci 38:542–553.
- Lee, H., Pagliaro, E., Berka, K., Folk, N., Anderson, D., Ruano, G., Keithn TP., Phipps, P., Herrin, GL., Garner, D. et al. (1991). Genetic Markers in Human Bone: I. Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Analysis. J Forensic Sci Vol 36, No. 2:320–330.
- Lin, S.W., Li, S.C. Ip. (2017). A selection guide for the new generation 6-dye DNA profiling systems, Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 3034–42.
- Pionzio, A.M., McCord, B.R. (2014). The effect of internal control sequence and length on the response to PCR inhibition in real-time PCR quantitation, Forensic Sci. Int.: Genet. 9 55–60.
- Tucker, A.J., Hopwood, C.J., Hopwood, JA., Sprecher, JC., McLaren, SR., Rabbach. RD., Ensenberger, GM., Thompson, MJ., Storts RD. (2011). Developmental validation of the PowerPlex®ESI 16 and PowerPlex® ESI 17 Systems: STR multiplex for the new European standard, Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 5 436–448.
- Zgonjanin D., Antov, M., Alghafri, R., Petković, S., Vuković, R., Stojiljković, G., Toljić, D. (2017). DNA analysis from human skeletal remains in forensic casework. Forensic Sci Int: Genet Suppl Ser 6:e342–e345.
- Zgonjanin, D., Petković, S., Maletin, M., Vuković, R., Drašković, D. (2015). Case report: DNA identification of burned skeletal remains. Forensic Sci Int: Genet Suppl Ser 5:e444–e446.
- Zgonjanin, D., Almohammed, E., Nedić, D., Milić, A., Petković, S. (2019). Importance of DNA analysis for identification and confirmation of human remains, following a forensic autopsy. Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series. Vol. 7, ISSUE 1, P53-55.Institute of Forensic Medicine, Clinical Center of Vojvodina, Novi Sad, Serbia