POLICY MOBILITY AND REFUGEES

Međunarodna naučna konferencija Društveno – ekonomski razvoj i obrazovanje sa akcentom na Republiku Srbiju i Raški okrug, Knj. 3 (pp. 43-50)

АУТОР(И) / AUTHOR(S): Bogdana Todorova 

Download Full Pdf   

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46793/87143.27.2.043T

САЖЕТАК / ABSTRACT:

The article analyses the refugee’s centers through the policy mobility and marginalized space. The study uses assemblage theory as the methodological approach. The theory emphasis meta-spatial flows that can transcend center’s boundaries. By moving from depiction of centers as static to an analysis of the dynamic connections and power relations that shape attitudes toward refugees, a unique understanding emerges.  

КЉУЧНЕ РЕЧИ / KEYWORDS:

policy mobility, refugee, marginalized space, attitudes

ЛИТЕРАТУРА / REFERENCES:

  • Agamben, G.(1998) Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life (Stanford: Stanford University Press).
  • Anderson, B., & McFarlane, C. (2011). Assemblage and Geography. Area, 43, 124-127.
  • Baker, T., & Temenos, C. (2015) ‘Urban policy mobilities research: Introduction to a debate’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39(4): 824–827.
  • Berg, K. G. (2014) From chaos to order and back: the construction of shelters and camps, 1950–1970’, in S. Hanafi, L. Hilal and L. Takkenberg (eds.), Palestinian Refugees: From Relief and Works to Human Development London: Routledge).
  • Blok, A. (2013) ‘Urban green assemblages: An ANT view on sustainable city building projects’, Science & Technology Studies, 26(1): 5–24.
  • Bryman, A., Clark, T., Foster, L., & Sloan, L. (2021) Bryman’s Social Research Methods (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
  • Benson, D., & Jordan, A. (2011) ‘What have we learned from policy transfer research? Dolowitz and Marsh revisited’, Political Studies Review, 9(3): 366– 378.
  • Bryant, R., & Hatay, M. (2011) ‘Guns and guitars: Simulating sovereignty in a state of siege’, American Ethnologist, 38(4): 631–649.
  • Clarke, J., & Bainton, D. (2015) Making Policy Move: Towards a Politics of Translation and Assemblage (Bristol: Policy Press).
  • Gramsci, A. (2011) The Prison Notebooks, (Columbia University Press), 238.
  • DeLanda M. (2006b) ‘Deleuzian social ontology and assemblage theory’, in Fuglsang M., Meier Sorensen B. (eds.), Deleuze and the Social (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press): 250–266.
  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1988) A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia (London: Bloomsbury Publishing).
  • Dovey, K. (2010) Becoming Places: Urbanism Architecture/Identity/Power (London: Routledge).
  • Esses, V., Dovidio, J., Jackson, L. & Armstrong, T. (2001) The immigration dilemma: The role of perceived group competition, ethnic prejudice and national identity. In: Journal of Social Issues 57 (3), 389-412.
  • Flint, J. (2009) ‘Cultures, ghettos and camps: sites of exception and antagonism in the city’, Housing Studies, 24(4): 417–431.
  • Foucault, M. (1967) Of Other Spaces. Translated by L. De Cauter and M. Dehaene’, jn Dehaene, and De Cauter, L. (eds.) (2008) Heterotopia and the City: Public space in a postcivil society (Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge): 13–29.
  • Isin, E. F., & Rygiel, K. (2007) ‘Abject spaces: Frontiers, zones, camps’, in
  • Dauphinee and C. Masters (eds.), The Logics of Biopower and the War on Terror (New York: Springer): 181–203.
  • Karaman, O. (2008) A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity by Manuel DeLanda. Antipod. 40 (5): 935– 937.
  • McCann, E. (2011) ‘Veritable inventions: cities, policies and assemblage’, Area, 43(2): 143–147.
  • McCann, E., & Ward, K. (2013) ‘A multi-disciplinary approach to policy transfer research: Geographies, assemblages, mobilities and mutations’, Policy Studies, 34(1): 2–18.
  • McFarlane, C. (2009) Translocal assemblages: Space, power and social movements. Geoforum, 40(4): 561–567.
  • Owens, P. (2009) ‘Reclaiming ‘bare life’?: Against Agamben on refugees’, International Relations, 23(4): 567–582.
  • Peck, J. (2011) ‘Geographies of policy: From transfer-diffusion to mobility- mutation’, Progress in Human Geography, 35(6): 773–797.
  • Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2010) ‘Mobilizing policy: Models, methods, and mutations’, Geoforum, 41(2): 169–174.
  • Quillian, L. (1995) Prejudice as a response to perceived group threat: Population composition and anti-immigrant and racial prejudice in Europe. In: American Sociological Review (60), 586-611.
  • Ramadan, A. (2013) Spatialising the refugee camp, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, Wiley, 38 (1), 65-77.
  • Riek et al, B. M; E. W. Mania, and S. L. Gaertner. (2006) Intergroup threat and outgroup attitudes: A meta-analytic review. In: Personality and Social Psychology review, 10 (4), 336-353.
  • Savage, G. C. (2020) ‘What is policy assemblage?’, Territory, Politics, Governance, 8(3): 319–335.
  • Sidanius, J. & Pratto, F. (1999) Social Dominance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Scott, A., & Storper, M. (2003) ‘Regions, globalization, development’, Regional Studies, 37(6–7): 579–593.
  • Scheepers, P., Gijsberts, M; & Coenders, M. (2002) Ethnic exclusion in European countries. Public opposition to civil rights for legal migrants as a response to perceived ethnic In: European Sociological Revie., 17-34.
  • Sniderman, P. M., L. Hagendoorn, and M. Prior. (2004) Predisposing factors and situational triggers: exclusionary reaction to immigrant minorities. In: American Political Science Review 98 (1), 35-49.
  • Stephan, & Renfro, C. (2002) The role of threat in intergroup relations. In:
  • M. Mackie and E. R. Smith (Eds.), From prejudice to intergroup emotions: Differentiated reactions to social groups. New York: Psychology Press, 191 – 207.
  • Temenos, C., & McCann, E. (2013) ‘Geographies of policy mobilities’, Geography Compass, 7(5): 344–357.
  • Ureta, S. (2015) Assembling Policy: Transantiago, Human Devices, and the Dream of a World-class Society (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
  • Vaughan-Williams, N. (2009) ‘The generalised bio-political border? Reconceptualising the limits of sovereign power’, Review of International Studies, 35(4), 729–749.
  • Wahid, A. (2019) ‘Narratives of segregation: Ghettos of Ahmedabad’, Agora Journal of Urban Planning and Design. Vol.13:68–75.
  • Ward, K. (2006) ‘Policies in motion’, urban management and state restructuring: the trans−local expansion of business improvement districts’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 30(1): 54–75.
  • Werner, P., & Strambach, S. (2018) ‘Policy mobilities, territorial knowledge dynamics and the role of KIBS: Exploring conceptual synergies of formerly discrete approaches’, Geoforum, 89: 19–28.
  • Wilkinson, F. (2008) “Hegemonia: Hegemony, Classical and Modern,” Journal of World-Systems Research, XIV, Vol.2, 119-141: 120.
  • Wood, A. (2021) ‘Policy Mobilities: How Localities Assemble, Mobilise, and Adopt Circulated Forms of Knowledge’, Companion to Urban and Regional Studies (May): 329–348.