Наслеђе 49 (2021), стр. 91-105

АУТОР(И): Maja P. Stanojević Gocić


Download Full Pdf   

DOI: 10.46793/NasKg2149.091SG


Reading is regarded as a cognitive process of meaning construction, or an interactive process that comprises low-level processes of word recognition and high-level processing of ideas. Schema theory implies the meaning of а text is not embedded in the text itself; it is actually created in an  active  manner  through  interaction  between  the reader and the text, in which readers use their world knowledge     to decode text meaning. Accordingly, readers bring their ideas, experience and previously gained knowledge into reading comprehension processes. The attainment of specific reading goals, including main idea comprehension and extracting specific information from the text, requires the employment of various reading strategies. In that sense, strategic behavior is deployed by proficient readers; it enables them to facilitate and improve text comprehension, which is the ultimate aim of the reading skill. 10 ESP students of the College of Applied Professional Studies in Vranje took part in this research as respondents. After completing their reading comprehension assignments, students reported on those tasks by virtue of think-aloud protocols. This type of research may provide an insight into specific problems students encounter during text processing activities, as well as strategies they employ to resolve them, which would facilitate the evaluation of reading performance and progress monitoring. The results imply that strategic training would enable ESP students to efficiently attain both general and specific reading goals.


reading comprehension, reading strategies, top-down processes, bottom-up processes, strategic training


  • Bethell, Aspinall 2003: G. Bethell, T. Aspinall, Test Your Business Vocabulary in Use, Cambridge: CUP.
  • Anderson 1999: N. Anderson, 1999. Exploring Second Language Reading: Issues and Strategies, Florence, KY: Heinle Cengage Learning.
  • Chamot 2004: А. Chamot, Issues in Language Learning Strategy Research and Teaching, Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching 1 (1), 14-26.
  • Council of Europe 2011: Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. < Source/Framework_EN.pdf> 8.1.2018.
  • Flavell 1987: J. H. Flavell, Speculations about the nature and development of metacog- nition. In: F. E. Weinert, R. H. Kluwe (eds.), Metacognition, motivation and understanding, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 21–29.
  • Grabe 2009: W. Grabe, Reading in a Second Language: Moving from Theory to Prac- tice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Grabe, Stoller 2011: W. Grabe, F. Stoller, Teaching and Researching Reading, London and New York: Routledge.
  • Koda 2005: K. Koda, Insights into Second Language Reading, New York: CUP. Mascull 2002: B. Mascull, Business Vocabulary in Use, Cambridge: CUP.
  • Mokhtari, Sheorey 2002: K. Mokhtari, R. Sheorey, Measuring ESL students’ aware- ness of reading strategies, Journal of Development Education 25(3): 2–10.
  • Nation 2013: P. Nation, Learning Vocabulary in Another Language, Cambridge: CUP. Nunan 1999: D. Nunan, Second Language Teaching and Learning, Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
  • O’Malley, Chamot 1990: J.M. O’Malley, A.U. Chamot, Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition, Cambridge: CUP.
  • Oxford 1990: R. Oxford, Language Learning Strategies – What Every Teacher Should Know, Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
  • Schramm 2008: K. Schramm. Reading and good language learners. In: C. Griffiths (eds.), Lessons from Good language Learners, Cambridge: CUP, 231-243.
  • Weil 2008: N. Weil, Vocabulary Size, Background Characteristics, and Reading Skill of Korean Intensive English Students, Asian EFL Journal 10 (4): 26-59.
  • Zhang 2001: L. Zhang, Awareness in Reading: EFL Students’ Metacognitive Knowl- edge of Reading Strategies in an Acquisition-poor Environment, Language Awareness 10 (4), 268-287.