АУТОР(И): Ivana B. Palibrk
Е-АДРЕСА: ivana.palibrk@filum.kg.ac.rs
DOI: 10.46793/NasKg2148.087P
САЖЕТАК:
Although our previous studies provided valuable insights into the characteristic graphostylemic features of main literary genres in general, the question of adapting to the technological developments in print requires more attention. Not only did the advancements cause considerable changes in writing practice and the perception of the novels, but they also indicated the rise of a new medium – the one between verbal and visual. This has become quite prominent, especially in contemporary novels in English: the possibilities of digital print emphasize the idea of media equality, of the text remaining the same regardless of its form. However, the way we attribute a meaning to a text does not depend solely on its content but its physical form as well. The notion “if a medium is changed, the content of the message also changes” is what nowadays motivates Anglo-American novelists to constantly test the novel’s materiality and us to explore the reasons behind it. This paper identifies all the graphostylemic techniques observed in several paradigmatic examples in English and the subject of our qualitative analysis is the overall significance of authors’ suggested patterns. Since their perspective on the current developments is revealed through the extreme graphostylistic markedness, this type of analysis seems inevitable. The main goal is to describe and classify the graphic devices, determine their functions and the effects they produce. With respect to the extralinguistic constraints of period and genre, the concluding remarks put forward the value of the most common graphostylistic means used by Anglo-American authors and the importance of similar analyses.
КЉУЧНЕ РЕЧИ:
graphostylistics, graphostylemes, graphostylistic features, new media, digital print, contemporary Anglo-American novels.
ЛИТЕРАТУРА:
Drucker 1996: Ј. Drucker, The Visible Word: Experimental Typography and Modern Art, 1909-1923, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Halliday 1985: M. Halliday, Spoken and written language, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hayles 2011: K. Hayles, “Material Entanglements: Steven Hall’s The Raw Shark Texts as Slipstream Novel”, Science Fiction Studies, 38/1, Greencastle: DePauw University, 115–133.
Hayles 2012: K. Hayles, How We ink: Digital Media and Contemporary Technogen- esis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Jeffries, McIntyre 2010: L. Jeffries, D. McIntyre, Stylistics, Cambridge: CUP.
Langer 1957: S. K. Langer, Philosophy in a New Key A Study in the Symbolism of Rea- son, Rite, and Art, third edition, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Mencia 2003: M. Mencia, From Visual Poetry to Digital Art: Image-Sound-Text, Con- vergent Media and the development of New Media Languages, London: University of the Arts London.
Ong 2012: W. J. Ong, Orality and Literacy – The Technologizing of the Word, London and New York: Routledge.
Palibrk 2014а: И. Палибрк, „На маргини: графостилеми у англоамеричкој стилистици”, у: Б. Мишић (ур.), Језик, књижевност, маргинализација: језичка истраживања, Ниш: Филозофски факултет, 273–286.
Palibrk 2014b: И. Палибрк, „Необично графички и невероватно савремено”, у: Д. Бошковић (ур.), Наслеђе, број 28, Крагујевац: ФИЛУМ, 145–164.
Palibrk 2017: И. Палибрк, Карактеристични графостилемски поступци у модерној англоамеричкој и српској књижевности, докторска дисертација, Крагујевац: ФИЛУМ, Универзитет у Крагујевцу.
Palibrk 2020: И. Палибрк, Енглески по Вуку? – Графостилемски аспект романа „Ридли Вокер“, у: М. Ковачевић (ур.), Српски језик, студије српске и словенске, књига 25, број 1, Београд: Универзитет у Београду, Филолошки факултет, 413–424.
Panko 2011: J. Panko, “Memory Pressed Flat into Text”: The Importance of Print in Steven Hall’s The Raw Shark Texts, Contemporary Literature, 52/2, Madi- son: University of Wisconsin Press, 265–293. < https://www.jstor.org/sta- ble/41261835>. 23. 10. 2019.
Parent 2005: R. E. Parent, The Digital Affect: A Rhetorical Hermeneutic for Reading, Writing and Understanding Narrative in Contemporary Literature and New Media, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh.
Polk 2009: J. D. Polk, Not Just Fun with Typography: Remediation of the Digital in Contemporary Print Fiction, San Marcos: Texas State University.
Sadokierski 2010: Z. Sadokierski, Visual writing: A critique of graphic devices in hybrid novels, from a VCD perspective, Sydney: University of Technology.
Hård af Segerstad 2002: Y. Hård af Segerstad, Use and Adaptation of Written Lan- guage to the Conditions of Computer-Mediated Communication, Gothen- burg: University of Gothenburg.
Sharples 1999: M. Sharples, How We Write: Writing as creative design, London, New York: Routledge.
Shlein 1999: L. Shlein, The Alphabet Versus The Goddess, New York: Penguin.
Van Leeuwen 2008: T. Van Leeuwen, New forms of writing, new visual competencies, in: J. Remmington (ed.) Visual Studies, No 23, vol. 2, London: Routledge, 130–135.
Wood 2008: J. Wood, How fiction works, London: Johnathan Cape.
Worthen 2005: W. B. Worthen, Print and the Poetics of Modern Drama, Cambridge: CUP.