Форум 1 (1-2) 2020, (стр. 27-41)
АУТОР(И): Татјана Грујић
Е-АДРЕСА: tatjanagrujic@yahoo.com
DOI: 10.46793/Forum20.27G
САЖЕТАК:
У овом раду представљен је спектар савремених приступа проучавању метафоре. Несумљиво најпопуларнији данашњи приступ овом феномену, теорија појмовне метафоре, односно теорија когнитивне метафоре Лејкофа и Џонсона, само је један од могућих, често комплементарних модела изучавања овог феномена. Стога се у раду разматра и теорија појмовног обједињавања Фоконијеа и Тарнера, Глаксбергов модел прикључења класи, хипотеза о „каријери метафоре‚, као и приступи метафори у оквиру дискурсне динамике, теорије релевантности и критичке анализе метафоре. Разноврсност ових перспектива и обиље могућих приступа метафори, који се не морају нужно међусобно искључивати, само потврђују обимност и сложеност посматраног феномена.
КЉУЧНЕ РЕЧИ:
појмовна метафора, приступи метафори
ЛИТЕРАТУРА:
Bowdle, B. F. & Gentner, D. (2005). The career of metaphor. Psychological Review, 112, 193-216.
Cameron, L. (2008). Metaphor and talk. In: R. Gibbs (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 197-211.
Cameron, L., R. Maslen, Z. Todd, J. Maule, P. Stratton & N. Stanley (2009). The discourse dynamics approach to metaphor and metaphor-led discourse analysis. Metaphor and Symbol, 24(2), pp. 63-89.
Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Houndmills, Basingstoke; Hampshire, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Croft, W., & Cruse, A. (2004). Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Deignan, A. (2005). Metaphor and Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Fauconnier, G. (2007). Mental spaces. In: D. Geeraerts and H. Cuyckens (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 351- 376.
Fauconnier, G. & M. Turner (1996). Blending as a central process of grammar. In: A. Goldberg (ed.), Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language. Stanford: Center for the study of language and information (distributed by Cambridge University Press), 113-130.
Fauconnier, G. & M. Turner (1998a). Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science, 22, 133-187.
Fauconnier, G. & M. Turner (1998b). Principles of conceptual intengration. In: J. P. Koening (ed.), Discourse and Cognition: Bridging the Gap. Stanford: SCLI/Cambridge. 269-283
Fauconnier, G. & M. Turner (1999). Metonymy and conceptual integration. In: K.-U. Panther & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in Language and Thought. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 77-90.
Fauconnier, G. & M. Turner (2002). The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.
Gentner, D. & Bowdle, B. F. (2001). Convention, form, and figurative language processing. Metaphor and Symbol, 16, 223-248.
Gentner, D., Bowdle, B. F., Wolff, P., & Boronat, C. B. (2001). Metaphor is like analogy.
In D. Gentner, K. J. Holyoak, & B. Kokinov (Eds.), The Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Science (pp. 199-253). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Giora, R. (ed.), (2001). Models of figurative language. Special issue of Metaphor and Symbol (Vol. 16, Nos 3 & 4). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Glucksberg, S. (1991). Beyond literal meanings: The psychology of allusion.
Psychological Science, 2, 146-152.
Glucksberg, S. (2001). Understanding Figurative Language: From Metaphors to Idioms. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Glucksberg, S., Brown, M., & M. McGlone, (1993). Conceptual metaphors are not automatically accessed during idiom comprehension. Memory and Cognition, 21, 711-719.
Glucksberg, S. & Keysar, B. (1990). Understanding metaphorical comparisons: Beyond similarity. Psychological Review, 97, 3-18.
Glucksberg, S. & Keysar, B. (1993). How metaphors work. In: A. Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and Thought: Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 401-424.
Glucksberg, S. & McGlone, M. (1999). When love is not a journey: What metaphors mean. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 1541-1558.
Grady, J., Oakley, T. & Coulson, S. (1999). Blending and metaphor. In: G. Steen & R. Gibbs (eds.), Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics, Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 101-124.
Јohnson, M. (1987). The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Johnson, M. (1993). Moral Imagination: Implications of Cognitive Science for Ethics.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Keysar, B. & Glucksberg, S. (1992). Metaphor and communication. Poetics Today, 13, 633-658.
Keysar, B., Shen, Y., Glucksberg, S., & Horton, W. (2000). Conventional language: How metaphorical is it? Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 576-593.
Klikovac, D. (2004). Metafore u mišljenju i jeziku. Beograd: Biblioteka XX vek. Кöveczes, Z. (2010*2002+). Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: OUP.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff G. (1991). Metaphor and war: The metaphor system used to justify war in the Gulf. Доступно нЋ: http://lists.village.virginia.edu/sixties/HTML_docs/Texts/Scholarly/Lakoff_Gulf_M etaphor_1.html
Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In: A. Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and Thought. 2nd edition, New York: Cambridge University Press, 202-251.
Lakoff G. & M. Johnson (2003 [1980]). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff G. & M. Johnson (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh. The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
Lakoff, G. & M. Turner (1989). More Than Cool Reason. A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Noveck I., M. Bianco, A. Castry. (2000). The Costs and Benefits of Metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol 16 (1&2), pp. 79-91.
Pancake, A. S. (1993). Taken by storm: the exploitation of metaphor in the Persian Gulf War. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 8, 281-295.
Rasulić, K. i D. Klikovac (2014). Jezik i saznanje: Hrestomatija iz kognitivne lingvistike.
Beograd: Filološki fakultet.
Rasulić, K. (2017). A metaphor biangle. Metaphor and the Social World 7:1, 130-151. Rohrer, T. (1995). The metaphorical logic of (political) rape. The new wor(l)d order.
Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 10, 115-137.
Steen, G. J. (2007). Finding Metaphor in Grammar and Usage: a Methodological Analysis of Theory and Research. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Sperber, D. & D. Wilson (1985/1986). Loose talk. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 86, 153-171.
Sperber, D. & D. Wilson (1995). Relevance: Communication and Cognition, 2nd ed.
Oxford: Blackwell.
Sperber, D. & D. Wilson (2008). A deflationary account of metaphors. In: R. Gibbs (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 84-108.
Sweetser, E. (1990). From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tendahl, M. & W. Gibbs (2008). Complementary perspectives on metaphor: Cognitive linguistics and relevance theory. Journal of Pragmatics 40, 1823-1864.
Turner, M. (1991). Reading minds: The study of English in the Age of Cognitive Science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Turner, M. & Fauconnier, G. (1995) Conceptual integration and formal expression.
Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 10, 183-203.
Turner, M., & Fauconnier, G. (1999). A mechanism of creativity. Poetics Today, 20, 397- 418.
Turner, M., & Fauconnier, G. (2000). Metaphor, metonymy and binding. In: A. Barcelona (ed.), Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads, Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 133-145.
Voss, James F., Kennet, Joel Wiley, Jennifer, &Schooler, Tonya Y. E. (1992). Experts at debate: The use of metaphor in the US senate debate on the Gulf crisis. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 7, 197-214.
Wilson, D. and D. Sperber (2004). Relevance theory. In: Horn, L. & G. Ward (eds.), The Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 607-632.
Wilson, D. & R. Carston (2006). Metaphor, relevance and the ‘emergent property’ issue. Mind & Language 21, 406-433.