Application of STEAM Principles in Educational Projects

AUTHOR(S) / АУТОР(И): Hasime Jashari , Selma Xheladini , Donika Fejzuli

Download Full Pdf   

DOI: 10.46793/STEAM-X24.213J

ABSTRACT / САЖЕТАК:

This paper explores the integration of STEAM (Science, Technology,
Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics) education in primary school
projects in the Republic of North Macedonia. STEAM education em-
phasizes interdisciplinary learning, encouraging students to develop
critical thinking, creativity, and problem-solving skills by combining
scientific inquiry with artistic and technological approaches. The study
involved 146 students aged 10 to 15, who participated in various proj-
ects including coding, environmental research, and digital storytelling.
The research methodology encompassed field and laboratory work,
coding activities, artistic creations, and literary projects. Students used
digital tools such as Flora Incognita, PlantNet, and Google Lens to en-
gage with biodiversity, while applications like Canva and Story Jumper
were used to develop artistic and literary outputs. Teacher, student,
and parent surveys revealed high levels of engagement and interest in
STEAM activities, alongside a strong desire for further training and
resources to support the implementation of these innovative projects.
The study found that STEAM education fosters a deeper understand-
ing of academic subjects, promotes critical 21st-century skills, and
motivates students to engage more actively in their learning process.
However, challenges related to limited resources and the need for
teacher training were identified. The paper concludes that with prop-
er support and investment, STEAM education has significant poten-
tial to enhance student learning and prepare them for future careers
in a rapidly evolving, technology-driven world.

KEYWORDS / КЉУЧНЕ РЕЧИ:

• Beeth, M., & McNeal, B. (1999). Co-teaching science and mathematics methods courses. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED443666).
• Beers, S. Z. (2011). 21st century skills: Preparing students for their future. National Association of Secondary School Principals.
• Brown, R., Brown, J., Reardon, K., & Merrill, C. (2011). Understanding STEM: Current perceptions. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(6), 5.
• Chalmers, C., Carter, M., Cooper, T., & Nason, R. (2017). Implementing “big ideas” to advance the teaching and learning of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(1), 25–43.
• Choi, K., Lee, H., Shin, N., Kim, S., & Krajcik, J. (2020). Implementing STEAM education in elementary schools: A comparison of the effects of different approaches. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 5.
• Cobo, C. (2013). Skills for innovation in the 21st century: Learning and education in developing countries. Education Research International, 2013, 1–10.
• Elliott, B., Oty, K., McArthur, J., & Clark, B. (2001). The effect of an interdisciplinary algebra/ science course on students’ problem-solving skills, critical thinking skills, and attitudes towards mathematics. International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology, 32(6), 811–816. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390110053784
• Frykholm, J., & Glasson, G. (2005). Connecting science and mathematics instruction: Pedagogical context knowledge for teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 105(3), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2005.tb18047.x
• Furner, J., & Kumar, D. (2007). The mathematics and science integration argument: A stand for teacher education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology, 3(3), 185–189.
• Henriksen, D. (2014). Full STEAM ahead: Creativity in excellent STEM teaching practices. The STEAM Journal, 1(2), 15.
• Henriksen, D. (2017). Creating STEAM with design thinking: Beyond STEM and arts integration. The STEAM Journal, 3(1), 34.
• Keefe, B. (2010). The perception of STEM: Analysis, issues, and future directions. Burbank, CA: Entertainment & Media Communication Institute, Division of Entertainment Industries Council.
• Lewis, S., Alacaci, C., O’Brien, G., & Jiang, Z. (2002). Preservice elementary teachers’ use of mathematics in a project-based science approach. School Science and Mathematics, 102(4), 172–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2002.tb18199.x
• Liao, C. (2016). From interdisciplinary to transdisciplinary: An arts-integrated approach to STEAM education. Art Education, 69(6), 44–49.
• Morrison, J. (2006). TIES STEM education monograph series: Attributes of STEM education. Baltimore, MD: TIES.
• Ng, M., & Rasli, A. (2018). Promoting innovation in Singapore schools: The STEAM approach. Journal of Innovation and Best Practices in Education, 7(2), 49–63.
• Pimthong, P., & Williams, J. (2018). Preservice teachers’ understanding of STEM education. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2018.08.001
• Rifandi, R., & Rahmi, Y. L. (2019, October). STEM education to fulfill the 21st-centurydemand: A literature review. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1317, No. 1, p. 012208). IOP Publishing.
• Sahlberg, P. (2011). Finnish lessons: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? Teachers College Press.
• Tytler, R. (2020). STEM education for the twenty-first century. In J. Anderson & Y. Li (Eds.), Integrated approaches to STEM education. Advances in STEM education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52229-2_3
• UNESCO. (2019). Education for sustainable development beyond 2019. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
• Yakman, G., & Lee, H. (2012). Exploring the exemplary STEAM education in the U.S. as a practical educational framework for Korea. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(6), 1072–1086.