AUTOR(I): Daniel A. Romano
E-ADRESA: bato49@hotmail.com
DOI: 10.46793/MANM4.041R
SAŽETAK:
Ovo istraživanje imalo je za cilj sticanje uvida u percepcije studenata studijskog programa za obrazovanje profesora razredne nastave (učitelja) o četvorostranicima i klasifikaciji četvorostranika. U tom cilju testirali smo 63 studenta treće i četvrte godine dva pedagoška fakulteta u BiH. Na osnovu povratnih informacija, ovaj istraživač je sklon formiranju slutnje/hipoteze da ova testirana populacija ima znatnih pote- škoća sa determinisanjem četvorostranika i njihovom klasifikacijom. Ova inicijalna studija nam sugeriše zaključak da su zablude koje imaju učenici nižih razreda sa ovom geometrijskom figurom posledica zabluda koje o njoj imaju njihovi nastavnici. Ako prihvatimo ovakvu konstataciju i ako je proširimo na čitavu nastavu geometrije u takvim školama, onda dolazimo do pretpostavke da je nedovoljan razvoj geometrijskog mišljenja („nivo 1” po Van Hileovoj klasifikaciji) kod učenika posledica nedovoljnih matematičkih i metodičkih znanja, ali i nedovoljno razvijenih sposobnosti njihovih nastavnika da razumiju procese podučavanja i učeničkog učenja. Dakle, probleme nastave geometrije u nižim razredima osnovne škole bi trebalo sagledavati prebacivanjem fokusa sa učenika na njihove nastavnike.
KLJUČNE REČI:
četvorostranici, klasifikacija četvorostranika, studen- ti učiteljskog programa.
LITERATURA:
Aktas, D. Y., Aktas, M. C. (2012). Eighth grade students’ understanding and hierarchical classification of quadrilaterals, Elementary Education Online, 11(3), 714–728.
Aktas, M. C., Aktas, D. Y. (2012). Students’ understanding of quadrilaterals: The sample of parallelogram, Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 1(1), 319–329.
Aytekin, C., Toluk Ucar, Z. (2011). Teachers’ definition of square, rectangle, parallelogram and trapezoid, In: B. Uduz, Proceedings of the 35th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 1, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey: PME.
Ball, D. L., Sleep, L. (2007). What is mathematical knowledge for teaching, and what are features of tasks that can be used to develop MKT? Presentation at the Center for Proficiency in Teaching Mathematics precession at the meeting of the Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators, Irvine, CA, January 25, 2007.
Ball, D., Bass, H., Sleep, L., Thames, M. (2005). A theory of mathematical knowledge for teaching, Paper prepared for work session at the 15th ICMI Study Conference The Professional Education and Development of Teachers of Mathematics, Aguas de Lindoia, Brazil.
Brunheira, L., Da Ponte, J. P. (2016). Prospective teachers work on defin- ing quadrilaterals through an exploratory approach, Didactica Mathermaticae, 38, 33–56.
Budiarto, M. T., Rahaju, E. B., Hartono, S. (2017). Students’ abstraction in re-cognizing, building with and constructing a quadrilateral, Educational Research and Reviews, 12(7), 394–402.
Crvenković, S., Milovanović, M., Romano, D. A. (2012). Neke dileme i pi- tanja koja se prirodno pojavljuju pri uvođenje pojma ’ugao’ u nižim razredima osnovne škole; IMO – Istraživanje matematičkog obrazovanja, Vol. IV, Br. 7, 17–30.
Crvenković, C., Milovanović, M., Romano, D. A. (2012a). Uporedna analiza prirode matematičkih znanja koje se koristi i konstruiše u učionici, Norma, 17(2), 133–154.
Çontay, E. G., Duatepe-Paksu, A. (2012). Preservice Mathematics Teachers’ understandings of the class inclusion between kite and square, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 55, 782–788.
Currie, P., Pegg, J. (1998). Investigating students’ understanding of the rela- tionships among quadrilaterals, In: C. Kanes, M. Goos, E. Warren (Eds.), Teaching Mathematics in New Times; Proceedings of the Twenty First Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia Incorporated, Vol. 2, 177– 184, Gold Coast, Australia, 5–8 July 1998. Griffith Uni Print, Brisbane, Australia, ISNB: 0-9596844-7-6.
De Villiers, M. (1994). The role and function of a hierarchical classification of quadrilaterals, For the Learning of Mathematics, 14, 11–18.
Duatepe-Paksu, A., Pakmak, G. S., Iymen, E. (2012). Pre-service Elementary Teachers’ Identification of Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for A Rhombus, Procedia – Social and Behavioural Sciences, 46, 3249–3253.
Fujita, T. (2012). Learners’ level of understanding of inclusion relations of quadrilaterals and prototype phenomenon, The Journal of Mathematical Behaviour, 31, 60–72.
Fujita, T., Jones, K. (2007). Learners’ understanding of the definitions and hierarchical classification of quadrilaterals: towards a theoretical framing, Research in Mathematics Education, 9(1&2), 3–20.
Marković, Z., Romano, D. A. (2013). Gaining insight of how do elementary school’s students in the Republic of Srpska conceptualize geometric shape of par- allelogram, IMVI Open Mathematical Education Notes, 3, 31–41.
Monaghan, F. (2000). What difference does it make? Children’s views of the differences between some quadrilaterals, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 42(2), 179–196.
Okazaki, M., Fujita, T. (2007). Prototype phenomen and common cog- nitive paths in the understanding of the inclusion relations between quadri- laterals in Japan and Scotland, In: J. H. Woo, H. C. Lew, K. S. Park, D. Y. Seo (Eds.), Proceedings 31st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 4, Seoul: PME, 41–48.
Ozdemir Erdogan, E., Dur, Z. (2014). Pre-service mathematics teachers’ per- sonal figural concepts and classifications about quadrilaterals, Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(6), 107–133.
Pickreign, J. (2007). Rectangle and rhombi: How well do pre-service teach- ers know them?, IUMPST – Issues in the Undergraduate Mathematics Preparation of School Teachers, 1, 1–7.
Rianasari, V. F., Julie, H., Sulistyani, N. (2016). Primary teachers’ under- standing of the inclusion relation of quadrilaterals, In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Education and Training – Improving The Quality of Education and Training Through Strengthening Networking, Faculty of Education, State University of Malang, East Java, Indonesia, 933–935.
Romano, D. A. (2009). O geometrijskom mišljenju, Nastava matematike, LIV (2–3), 1–11.
Romano, D. A., Vinčić, V. (2010). Uvid u studentsko razumijevanje paralel- nih i mimoilaznih pravih, Nastava matematike, LV (3–4), 1–7.
Romano, D. A. (2011). Jedno utvrđivanje matematičkih kompetencija stude- nata učiteljskog programa, Nastava matematike, LVI (1–2), 8–18.
Romano, D. A., Vinčić, D. A. (2013). Šta je duž – jedno istraživanje aspekata budućih učitelja, Naša škola, 63(233), 139–156.
Romano, D. A. (2017). Percepcije geometrijskog koncepta pravougaonika studenata učiteljskog programa, Inovacije u nastavi, 30(2), 158–171.
Türnüklü, R., Akkaş, E. N., Alaylı, F. G. (2013). Mathematics Teachers’ Perceptions of Quadrilaterals and Understanding the Inclusion Relations, In:
- Ubuz, Ç. Haser, M. A. Mariotti (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eighth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education, Ankara: Middle East Technical University, 705–714.
Türnüklü, E. (2014). Construction of inclusion relations of quadrilaterals: Analysis of pre-service elementary mathematics teachers’ lesson plans, Education and Science, 39(173), 198–208.
Vinner, S. (1991). The role of definitions in the teaching and learning of mathematics, In: D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced Mathematical Thinking, Mathematics Education Library, Vol 11, Springer, Dordrecht, 65–81.
Usiskin, Z., Griffin, J., Witonsky, D., Willmore, E. (2008). The classification of quadrilaterals: A study in definition, Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.