ŠKOLA KAO SREDINA PODSTICAJNA ZA UČENJE – INSTRUMENT I PERCEPCIJE NASTAVNIKA

Uzdanica XVII 2 (2020), (str. 233-249)

AUTOR(I): Jelena D. Teodorović

E-ADRESA: 

Download Full Pdf 

DOI: 10.18485/uzdanica.2020.17.2.16

SAŽETAK:

Istraživanja u obrazovanju su često usmerena na ispitivanje faktora koji utiču na učeničko postignuće. Kvalitetna nastava zauzima prioritetno mesto među ovim varijablama, ali se postulira da su i mnogobrojni školski konstrukti važni za učeničke ishode. Jedan od njih – škola kao sredina podsticajna za učenje – u fokusu je ovog rada. Cilj istraživanja je bio da se razviju, testiraju i opišu skale koje mere školu kao sredinu podsticajnu za učenje, kao i da se te skale iskoriste za procenu percepcija nastavnika o njihovoj školi kao sredini podsticajnoj za učenje. Osmišljene su i ispitivane sledeće skale: Interpersonalni odnosi i socijalna klima u školi; Inovacije, vizija i razvoj škole; Organizacija rada u školi; Učenje kao vrednost u školi; i Liderstvo u školi. Uzorak je obuhvatao 2401 nastavnika iz 125 škola koji su putem upitnika izneli svoje percepcije. Rezultati Analize glavnih komponenti (PCA) su pokazali da podaci podržavaju postojanje tri umesto pet skala, odnosno da skala Inovacije, vizija i razvoj škole nije adekvatna, kao i da Organizacija rada u školi i Liderstvo u školi u očima nastavnika predstavljaju jedinstvenu skalu. Pouzdanost skala dobijenih iz PCA je zadovoljavajuća. Nastavnici u Srbiji su veoma zadovoljni varijablama koje opisuju školu kao sredinu podsticajnu za učenje, mada ima prostora za unapređivanje međuljudskih odnosa i motivacije zaposlenih.

KLJUČNE REČI:

škola kao sredina podsticajna za učenje, školski faktori, učeničko postignuće, skale, Srbija

LITERATURA:

  • Buš,Glover (2002): T. Bush, D. Glover,School Leadership: Concepts and Evidence, Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.
  • Bodroža, Teodorović, Jošić (2020, na recenziji): B. Bodroža, J. Teodorović, S. Jošić,Validation of the scales for measuring factors of teaching quality from the Dynamic model of educational effectiveness.
  • Valiente, Ajzenberg, Spinrad, Haugen, Tompson, Kufer (2013): C. Valiente, N. Eisenberg, T. Spinrad, R. Haugen, M. Thompson, A. Kupfer, Effortful control and impulsivity as concurrent and longitudinal predictors of academic achievement,Journal of Early Adolescence, 33(7), 946–972.
  • Kastro, Ekspozito-Kasas, Lopez-Martin, Lizasoan, Navar-Asencio, LuisGaviria (2015): M. Castro, E. Exposito-Casas, E. Lopez-Martin, L. Lizasoain, E. Navar-Asencio, J. Luis-Gaviria, A parental involvement on student academic achievement: A meta analisys,Educational Research Review,14(1), 33–46.
  • Kejn, Kantrel (2010): T. J. Kane, S. Cantrell,Learning about teaching: Initial findings from the measures of effective teaching project, MET Project Research Paper, Seattle, WA: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
  • Kejn, Kantrel (2012): T. J. Kane, S. Cantrell,Gathering feedback for teaching. Combining high-quality observations with student surveys and achievement gains, MET Project Research Paper, Seattle, WA: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
  • Kiriakides, Hristoforu, Haralambus (2013): L. Kyriakides, C. Christoforou, C. Y. Charalambous, What matters for student learning outcomes: A meta-analysis of studies exploring factors of effective teaching,Teaching and Teacher Education, 36, 143−152.
  • Klime (2012): E. Klieme, Qualities and effects of teaching: Integrating findings across subjects and cultures,EARLI Sig Educational Effectiveness Conference, Zurich, Switzerland, 23 August 2012.
  • Krimers, Kiriakides (2008): B. P. M. Creemers, L. Kyriakides,The Dynamics of educational effectiveness: A contribution to policy, practice and theory in contemporary schools, London: Routlege. 
  • Kruger, Šerens (2012): M. Krüger, J. Scheerens, Conceptual perspectives on school leadership, In: J. Scheerens (Ed.),School leadership effects revisited: Review and meta-analysis of empirical studies, New York: Springer, 1–30. 
  • Litvud, Dej, Samons, Haris, Hopkins (2006): K. Leithwood, C. Day, P. Sammons, A. Harris, D. Hopkins,Successful school seadership: What it is and how it influences pupil learning, Research Report 800, London: DfES. 
  • Litvud, Luis, Anderson, Volstrom (2004): K. Leithwood, K. Louis, S. Anderson, K. Wahlstrom,The Learning from Leadership Project (2004–2009), New York: Wallace Foundation. 
  • Muijs, Rejnolds (2000): D. Muijs, D. Reynolds, School effectiveness and teacher effectiveness in mathematics: Some preliminary findings from the evaluation of the Mathematics Enhancement Program (Primary),School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11(3),273–303. 
  • MekKul (2007): S. S. McKool, Factors that influence the decision to read: an investigation of fifth grade students’ out-of-school reading habits,Reading Improvement, 44(3), 111–131. 
  • Nilsen, Gustafson (2016): T. Nilsen, J.-E. Gustafsson,Teacher quality, instructional quality and student outcomes: relationships across countries, cohorts and time, Springer Nature.
  • Palant (2013): J. Palant, SPSS Survival Manual, A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS, 4thedition, Allen & Unwin.
  • Sirin (2005): S. R. Sirin, Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: a meta-analytic reviewof research,Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 417–453.
  • Tedli, Rejnolds (2000): C. Teddlie, D. Reynolds,International Handbook of School Effectiveness, London: Falmer.
  • Teodorović (2011): J. Teodorović, Classroom and school factors related to student achievement: What works for students?,School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 22(2), 215–236.
  • Teodorović (2012): J. Teodorović, Student background factors influencing student achievement in Serbia,Educational Studies, 38(1), 89–110.
  • Teodorović, Vujačić, Đerić (2020): J. Teodorović, M. Vujačić, I. Đerić, Uticaj individualnih karakteristika učenika na postignuće i interesovanje za matematiku i biologiju,Uzdanica, XVII/1, 213–236.
  • Teodorović, Milin, Bodroža, Đerić, Vujačić, Jakšić, Stanković, Cankar, Haralambus, Van Dam, Kiriakides (2020a, na recenziji): J. Teodorović, V. Milin, B. Bodroža, I. Đerić, M. Vujačić, I. Jakšić, D. Stanković, G. Cankar, C. Charalambous, J. Van Damme, L. Kyriakides,Testing the dynamic model of educational effectiveness: The impact of teacher factors on interest and achievement in mathematics and biology in Serbia.
  • Teodorović, Živković (2020, na recenziji): J. Teodorović, R. Živković, Upravljanje promenama i osiguranje kvaliteta u srednjim stručnim školama u Srbiji: Stavovi direktora.
  • Teodorović, Stanković, Bodroža, Milin, Đerić (2016): J. Teodorović, D.Stanković, B. Bodroža, V. Milin, I. Đerić, Education policymaking in Serbia through the eyes of teachers, counsellors and principals,Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability,28(4), 347‒375.
  • Teodorović, Ševkušić, Malinić, Džinović (2020b, u štampi): J. Teodorović, S. Ševkušić, D. Malinić, V. Džinović,Potrebe, problemi i kompetencije direktora škola u Srbiji.
  •  Babin, R. E. Anderson,Multivariate Data Analysis, 8thEdition, Cengage, UK.
  • Heti (2009): J. Hattie,Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement, Routledge.
  • Hjuz-Hasel, Luc (2006): S. Hughes-Hassell, C. Lutz, What do you want to tell us about reading? A survey of the habits and attitudes of urban middle school students toward leisure reading,Young Adult Library Services, 4(2), 39–45.
  • Hopkins, Rejnolds (2001): D. Hopkins, D. Reynolds, The past, present and future of school improvement: Towards the third age,British Educational Research Journal, 27(4), 459–475.
  • Šerens (2000): J. Scheerens,Improving school effectiveness(Fundamentals of Educational Planning No. 68), Paris: UNESCO/International Institute for Educational Planning.