UTICAJ NOVIH VEGETATIVNIH PODLOGA NA BUJNOST, PRINOS I POMOLOŠKE OSOBINE SORTI ŠLJIVE „ČAČANSKA LEPOTICA“ I „JOJO“

Savetovanje o biotehnologiji sa međunarodnim učešćem (Čačak: 27; 2022) (str. 161-172)

АУТОР(И): Nebojša Milošević, Ivana Glišić, Milena Đorđević, Sanja Radičević, Slađana Marić

Е-АДРЕСА: mnebojsa@ftn.kg.ac.rs

Download Full Pdf   

DOI: 10.46793/SBT27.161M

САЖЕТАК:

Pored brojnih nedostataka, sejanac džanarike (Prunus cerasifera Ehrh.) je najzastupljenija podloga za šljivu u Republici Srbiji. Iako se u svetu dosta radi na stvaranju vegetativnih podloga, one uglavnom nisu dostupne proizvođačima u našoj zemlji. U ovom radu je ispitivan uticaj četiri vegetativne podloge: ʻWavitʼ, ʻWeivaʼ, ʻDoceraʼ i ʻDospinaʼ, od kojih su poslednje dve hipersenzitivne na virus šarke šljive, na bujnost, prinos i pomološke osobine dve sorte šljive ʻCV ačanska lepoticaʼ i ʻJojoʼ. Utvrđeno je da su pomenute podloge na različit način uticale na ispitivane osobine. Najveću bujnost stabla obe sorte uzrokovala je podloga ‘Weiva’, dok su najslabiju bujnost sorte ‘Čačanska lepotica’ uzrokovale podloge ‘Docera’ i ‘Wavit’, a sorte ‘Jojo’ podloga ‘Dospina’. Najveći prinos je indukovala podloga ‘Weiva’, a najslabiji podloge ‘Docera’ i ‘Wavit’. Najveći uticaj na masu ploda imale su podloge ‘Weiva’ i ‘Wavit’, a na morfometrijske osobine ploda ‘Dospina’ i ‘Wavit’. Kada su u pitanju sorte, veća bujnost, prinos, masa i dimenzije ploda su utvrđeni kod sorte ‘Jojo’ u odnosu na sortu ‘Čačanska lepotica’.

КЉУЧНЕ РЕЧИ:

šljiva, sorta, podloga, bujnost, prinos

ЛИТЕРАТУРА:

  • Blažek J., Pištěková I. (2009). Preliminary evaluation results of new plum cultivars in a dense planting. Horticultural Science, 36, 45–54.
  • Crisosto C.H., Garner D., Crisosto G.M., Bowerman E. (2004). Increasing ‘Blackamber’ plum (Prunus salicina Lindley) consumer acceptance. Postharvest Biology and Technology 34, 237–244.
  • Ertekin C., Gozlekci Z., Kabas O., Sonmez S., Akinci I. (2006). Some physical, pomological and nutritional properties of two plum (Prunus domestica L.) cultivars. Journal of Food Engineering, 75, 508–514.
  • Glišić, I.P., Milošević, T., Ilić, R., Paunović, G., Mitrović, M. (2021): Tree growth, productivity and fruit size of ‘Čačanska Lepotica’ and ‘Čačanska Najbolja’  plums as influenced by rootstock. Acta Hortic. 1322, 147‒154. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2021.1322.22
  • Käthner, J., Ben-Gal, A., Gebbers, R., Peeters, A., Herrpich, W.B., Zude-Sasse, M. (2017): Evaluating spatially resolved influence of soil and tree water status on quality of european plum grown in semi-humid climate. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8: 1053. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01053
  • Loreti, F.,Massai, R., fei, R.C., Cinelli, F. (1999): Preliminary results on the bio- agronomic performance of some apricot rootstocks. Italus Hortus, 6, 71–72.
  • Meland, M., Frøynes, O. and Maas, F. (2019): Performance of dwarfing and semi-dwarfing plum rootstocks on three European plum scion cultivars in a Nordic climate. Acta Horticulturae 1260, 181‒186. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2019.1260.28
  • Mészáros, M., Kosina, J., Laňar, L., Náměstek, J. (2015): Long-term evaluation of growth and yield of Stanley and Cacanska lepotica plum cultivars on selected rootstocks. Horticultural Science 42 (1): 22–28. https://doi.org/10.17221/192/2014-HORTSCI.
  • Milatović, D., Zec, G., Đurović, D., Boškov, Đ. (2020): Growth and yield performance of late-season plum cultivars in the Belgrade area. Acta Agriculturae Serbica, 25 (49): 59‒63.
  • Miletić, R., Milošević, N., Karaklajić-Stajić, Ž., Paunović, S.M., Tomić, J., Pešaković, M., Milinković, M. (2019): Influence of dense planting on productivity and fruit quality of dessert plum cultivars. Acta Horticulturae, 1260: 241‒248. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2019.1260.38
  • Milošević T., Milošević N. (2018). Plum (Prunus spp.) Breeding. In: J.M. Al-Khayri,
  • M.S. Jain, D.V. Johnson (Eds.), Advances in Plant Breeding Strategies: Fruits. Volume 3, Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018. pp. 165–215.
  • Milošević, N., Glišić, I., Đorđević, M., Lukić, M. (2018): Pomološke i proizvodne osobine nekih novijih sorti šljive. Zbornik radova XXIII savetovanja o biotehnologiji, Čačak, 1: 154‒161.
  • Milošević, T., Milošević, N. (2012): Rootstock-induced changes in the dry matter and carbohydrate content of bearing shoots and flower buds of plum cultivar. The Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology, 87 (4): 347‒352.
  • Milošević, T., Milošević, N., Mladenović, J. (2020): Combining fruit quality and main antioxidant attributes in the sour cherry: The role of new clonal rootstock. Scientia Horticulturae, 265: 109236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109236
  • Mohsenin, N.N., (1980): Physical Properties of Plant and Animal Materials. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers Inc., New York, pp. 51–87.
  • Moreno, M.A. (2004): Breeding and selection of Prunus rootstocks at the Aula Dei experimental station, Zaragoza, Spain. Acta Horticulturae 658, 519‒528. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2004.658.79
  • Neumüller, M., Dittrich, F. and Hadersdorfer, J. (2019): Breeding for Plum pox virus resistant rootstocks by interspecific hybridization of Prunus species – state of the art and preliminary results of rootstock trials. Acta Horticulturae 1260, 41‒46. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2019.1260.8
  • Neumüller, M., Mühlberger, L., Siegler, H., Hartmann, W., Treutter, D. (2013): New rootstocks with resistance to Plum pox virus for Prunus domestica and other stone fruit species: the ‘Docera’ and ‘Dospina’ rootstock series. Acta Horticulturae 985, 155‒165. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2013.985.19
  • Popara, G., Magazin, N., Keserović, Z., Milić, B., Milović, M., Kalajdžić, J., Manojlović M, (2020): Rootstock and interstock effects on plum cv. ‘Čačanska Lepotica’ young tree performance and fruit quality. Erwerbs-Obstbau, 62 (3): 421‒428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-020-00512-y
  • Rozpara, E., Glowacka, A., Grzyb, Z.S. (2010): The growth and yields of eight plum cultivars grafted on two rootstocks. Acta Horticulturae, 734: 157–161. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2007.734.18
  • Salazar, A.E., Torrents, J., Bordas, M., Val, J. and Moreno, M.A. (2018): Graft compatibility for new released Prunus rootstocks. Acta Horticulturae 1228, 175‒180. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2018.1228.26
  • Stefanova B., Dragoyski K., Dinkova H., Djouvinov V. (2010). The plum cultivar  ‘Jojo’ grown under the conditions of the central Balkan mountains in Bulgaria. Acta Horticulturae, 874, 281‒288.
  • Tomić, J., Glišić, I.P., Ilić, R., Pešaković, M., Karaklajić-Stajić, Ž., Paunović, S.M. (2021): Variation in productivity and fruit quality of the plum depending on rootstock. Acta Horticulturae 1322: 163‒170. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2021.1322.24 Tomić, J., Glišić, I., Milošević, N., Štampar, F., Mikulič-Petkovšek, M. Jakopič, J. (2022): Determination of fruit chemical content of two plum cultivars grafted on four rootstocks. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 105: 103944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2021.103944
  • USDA Soil Taxonomy – A basic system of soil classification for making and Interpreting soil surveys, 2nd Ed. 1999. Available at: ftp://ftp- fc.scegov.usda.gov/NSSC/Soil_Taxono-my/tax.pdf,                Natural  Resources Conservation Service, n. 436, 1‒871. Accessed 4 February 2022.
  • Yordanov, A., Tabakov, S., Kaymakanov, P. (2015): Comparative study of Wavit® rootstock with two plum and two apricot cultivars in nursery. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 60 (2): 159‒168. https://doi.org/10.2298/JAS1502159Y
  • Zamfirescu, B., Hoza, D., Butac, M., Chivu, M. (2020): Influence of some rootstocks on the growth, yield and fruits quality at the ‘Jojo’ plum cultivar. Scientific Papers. Series B, Horticulture, 46 (1): 210‒214.