Eighth International Scientific Conference Contemporary Issues in Economics, Business and Management [EBM 2024], [pp. 239-253]
AUTHOR(S) / AUTOR(I): Božidar Čakajac
, Nenad Janković 
DOI: 10.46793/EBM24.239C
ABSTRACT / SAŽETAK:
The trade deficit is one of the most consistent macroeconomic constraints of the Serbian economy, simultaneously reflecting negatively on the country’s external position. Despite the fact that during the observed period (2007-2023) the average export growth rate was higher than the import growth rate, the trade balance deficit has remained an unsolvable enigma for Serbian economic policymakers. The trend of decreasing the trade balance deficit, established after the global economic crisis, was interrupted in 2016 when it began to rise again. Simultaneously, since 2016, there has been more intensive economic cooperation between Serbia and China, especially in the merchandise trade. By the end of the observed period, China had become Serbia’s second most important foreign trade partner, which affected the reduction of the share of traditionally the most significant trade partners of Serbia in the trade of goods: Italy, Russia, and Bosnia and Herzegovina. The importance of China as a foreign trade partner is more evident on the import side, but in recent years, China has also become an increasingly significant export market for Serbia. This is understandable considering the fact that Chinese companies are currently the largest exporters from Serbia and key generators of export growth to China. The faster growth of imports from China compared to exports has led to an increase in the trade deficit with the Chinese economy. Compared to other major trading partners, Serbia has the highest trade deficit with China, which in 2023 accounted for more than half of Serbia’s total trade deficit. Given that the trade deficit is the key cause of the balance of payments imbalance in the domestic economy, reducing the trade deficit with China will be very important for improving Serbia’s balance of payments position.
KEYWORDS / KLJUČNE REČI:
Trade deficit, Current account deficit, Import, Export, Serbia, China
REFERENCES / LITERATURA:
- Bagnai, D. (2009). The role of China in global external imbalances: Some further evidence. China Economic Review, 20(3), 508-526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2008.11.002
- Božić, D., Nikolić, M. (2017). Serbian foreign trade and importance of agrarian sector. Themes, 41(3), 711-730. https://doi.org/10.22190%2FTEME1703711B
- Brkić, D. (2024). Serbian Energy Sector in a Gap Between East and West. Energy, Exploration & Exploitation, 42(1), 330-340.http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/01445987231215445
- Cota, B., Erjavec, N., Bogdan, Ž. (2017). External imbalances in emerging and advanced European countries. Economic Research, 30(1), 1553-1571. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2017.1340179
- Cotella, G., Berisha, E. (2022). The impact of China’s Belt and Road Initiative on the Western Balkan Region: An erosion of EU conditionaly? European Spatial Research and Policy 28(2), 165-186. http://dx.doi.org/10.18778/1231-1952.28.2.09
- Čakajac, B., Janković, N., Luković, S. (2023). The Role of Remittances in Financing the Current Account Deficit: The Case of Serbia. Our Economy, 69(3), 35-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/ngoe-2023-0016
- Dugalić, V., Kovačević, R., Janković, N. (2023). International Finances. Faculty of Economics, University of Kragujevac
- Ercegovac, D., Beker Pucar, E. (2022). The nexus between FDI and external balance in selected Emerging European Economies – a panel data approach. The Annals of the Faculty of Economics in Subotica, 58(47), 147-164. http://dx.doi.org/10.5937/AnEkSub2247147E
- Gao, Y., Cheng, W., Yuan, Q. (2018). Understanding the global imbalance from the perspective of processing trade value added of China. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, 16(1), 1-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14765284.2018.1504529
- Garcia – Herrero, A., Xu, J. (2022). EU-China Trade: A Review of the Facts and Where We Stand. In Chan Kim, Y. (ed) China and the Belt and Road Initiative. Springerlink. pp 1-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86122-3_1
- Ivanović, V., Zakić, K. (2023). Belt and Road investments in Serbia: Is China a new savior or a new threat? International affairs. 75(1), 65-92. https://doi.org/10.2298/MEDJP2301065I
- Jaćimović, D., Dragutinović Mitrović, R., Bjelić, P., Tianping, K., Rajković, M. (2018). The role of Chinese investments in the bilateral exports of new E.U. member states and Western Balkan countries. Economic Research, 31(1), 1185-1197. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2018.1456357
- Jovičić, E., Stevanović, S., Beraha, I. (2020). Serbia-China Bilateral Trade Relations: Major Challenges and Opportunities. Economic Analysis. 53(2), 133-144. https://doi.org/10.28934/ea.20.53.2
- Jovičić, E., Stojanović, D. (2022). Key Features and Challenges of the China-Western Balkan Countries Merchandise Trade Development. Economic Analysis, 55(2), 79-90. https://doi.org/10.28934/ea.22.55. 2.pp79-90
- Jovičić, E., Marjanović, D. (2024). The Contemporary Development of Serbia-China and Serbia-Russia Relations: Is This the Opportune Moment for Economic Cooperation Expansion? The Review of International Affairs 75(1190), 109-137. https://doi.org/10.18485/iipe_ria.2024.75.1190.5
- Kovačević, R. (2020). The causal relationship between current account and financial account balance in Western Balkan countries: The case of Serbia. Banking, 49(4), 9-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.5937/bankarstvo2004009K
- Kovačević, R. (2021). Serbia’s foreign exchange reserve adequacy and the factors influencing their accumulation. Economic Horizons, 23(1), 33-53. https://doi.org/10.5937/ekonhor2101033K
- Kovačević, R. (2022). The effects of FDI net inflow on the current account of Southeast Europe countries – a panel causality analysis. Economic Annals 67(235), 95-122. https://doi.org/10.2298/EKA2235095K
- Lazarov, D., Miteva – Kacarski, E. (2023). Intraregional trade perspective and untapped trade potentials of the Western Balkan region. Economic Horizons, 25(3), 243-259. https://doi.org/10.5937/ekonhor2303261L
- Liu, Z. (2019). China’s Investments in the Balkans under the Belt and Road Initiative: A Chinese Perspective. Insight Turkey, 21(2), 91-105. DOI: 10.25253/99.2019212.07
- Marjanović, D., Jovičić, E., Stojanović, D. (2021). The Global Distribution of Chinese Investments- Importance for the Economy of Serbia. Ekonomika. 67(1), 43-55. https://doi.org/10.5937/ekonomika2101043M
- Matthes, J. (2024). China’s Trade Surplus – Implications for the World and for Europe. Intereconomics. 59(2), 104-111. https://doi.org/10.2478/ie-2024-0022
- Ministry of Finance of Serbia (2023). Current macroeconomic trends. Available at: https://www.mfin.gov.rs/dokumenti2/tekuca-makroekonomska-kretanja-prezentacija
- National Bank of Serbia (2023). Balance of payments statistics. Available at: https://www.nbs.rs/sr_RS/drugi-nivo-navigacije/statistika/platni_bilans/
- Nedopil, C. (2023). „Countries of the Belt and Road Initiative― Green Finance & Develelopment Center, FISF Fudan University Shangai. Available at: https://greenfdc.org/countries-of-the-belt-and-road-initiative-bri/?cookie-state- change=1721470868020
- Nikolić, G., Nikolić I. (2020). The structural changes of the Serbian merchandise trade during transition process: comparative analysis of main trade indicators. Economics of Enterprise. 68(5-6), 383-399. https://doi.org/10.5937/EKOPRE2006383N
- Rogers, S. (2022). Illiberal capitalist development: Chinese state-owned capital investment in Serbia. Contemporary Politics. 28(3), 347-364. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2021.2022876
- Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia (2023). External trade. Available at: https://www.stat.gov.rs/en-us/oblasti/spoljna-trgovina/
- Zakić, K. (2020). The results and risks of China’s Belt and Road investment projects in Serbia. The Review of International Afairs, 71(11180), 45-71. https://doi.org/10.18485/iipe_ria.2020.71.1180.3
- Zubalova, L., Drienikova, K., Ujlaky, L., Dureckova E.M. (2023). The European Union and China Trade Presence in Serbia. Journal of Liberty and International Affairs. 9(3), 370-405. https://doi.org/10.47305/JLIA2393370z