SOME REFLECTIONS ON STEAM EPISTEMIOLOGIES: SYNKRASIS, MIXIS OR SYNTHESIS?

STEM/ STEAM/ STREAM APPROACH IN THEORY AND PRACTICE OF CONTEMPORARY EDUCATION, 2025 (pp. 91-98)

AUTHOR(S) / АУТОР(И): Predrag Živković

Download Full Pdf   

DOI: 10.46793/STREAM25.091Z

ABSTRACT / САЖЕТАК:

The introduction focuses on the ancient Greek concepts of synkrasis and mixis, linking them to modern interdisciplinary frameworks and STEAM education methodologies. It emphasizes the importance of evaluating the integration quality among STEAM subjects, highlighting a tendency among educators to oversimplify these relationships. The historical emergence of disciplines in the 19th century and their implications for knowledge production is discussed, noting critiques of rigid boundaries that limit inquiry. Interdisciplinarity, while a contemporary focus, has roots in ancient understandings, yet it now often struggles against the fragmentation of knowledge. The distinctions between interdisciplinary, multidisciplinary, and transdisciplinary approaches are clarified, with transdisciplinarity positioned as a more collaborative and integrative method that transcends traditional boundaries. Transdisciplinarity is identified as a vital research principle that fosters holistic integration, essential for addressing complex global challenges. It contrasts with temporary interdisciplinary collaborations by advocating for sustained change in scientific inquiry structures. The conclusion underscores the need for a nuanced understanding of disciplines and their historical context, advocating for a revival of coherent disciplinary concepts within transdisciplinary frameworks.

KEYWORDS / КЉУЧНЕ РЕЧИ:

interdisciplinarity, transdisciplinarity, synkrasis, mixis, STEAM

REFERENCES / ЛИТЕРАТУРA: 

  • Bernstein, J. H. (2014). Disciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in the study of knowledge. Informing Science: the International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline, 17, 241–273. Available at: http://www.inform.nu/Articles/Vol17/ISJv17p241-273Bernstein0681.pdf
  • Danermark, B. (2019): Applied interdisciplinary research – a critical realist perspective. Journal of Critical Realism, 18(4): 368–382.
  • Kelley, T. R. & Knowles, G. J. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3:11. DOI 10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z
  • Mejias, S., Thompson, N., Sedas, R. M., et al. (2021). The trouble with STEAM and why we use it anyway. Science Education, 105, 209–231. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21605
  • Mittelstrass, J. (2018). The Order of Knowledge: From Disciplinarity to Transdisciplinarity and Back. European Review, 26(S2), 68–75. DOI:10.1017/S1062798718000273
  • Politi, V. (2019). The interdisciplinarity revolution. Theoria. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science, 34(2), 237–252. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.18864.
  • Rodrigues-Silva, J. & Alsina, A. (2023). Conceptualising and framing STEAM education: what is (and what is not) this educational approach? Texto Livre: Belo Horizonte: 16, 2–13, DOI: 10.1590/1983-3652.2023.44946