The Justification for the Existence of Fiduciary Duties in Company Law

 Law in the process of globalisation (2018), (стр. 515-530) 

АУТОР: Borko Mihajlovic

Е-АДРЕСА: bmihajlovic@jura.kg.ac.rs

Download Full Pdf   

DOI: 10.46793/LawPG.515M

САЖЕТАК: 

Fiduciary duties are a widely recognized legal institution, and they present one of the most important attempts in law to solve the first agency problem and to constrain broad management powers. The subject of this paper is the issue of the justification for the existence of fiduciary duties, which has been present almost since the inception of this institution. At the beginning, the author presents a short overview of the emergence of fiduciary duties in the Anglo-Saxon law and the legal transplant of these duties to continental Europe. In the next part of the paper the author considers the first aspect of the main issue of the paper that is the justification for the existence of fiduciary duties. The first aspect deals with the various theories dedicated to reason, purpose, and rationale for the existence of fiduciary duties in  company law. The second aspect of the issue deals with the modern views, which strive to determine whether the fiduciary duties’ existence in company law is justified at all. Finally – in the conclusion – the author tries to determine the relevance of the questions raised in this paper for Serbian company law.

КЉУЧНЕ РЕЧИ:

fiduciary duties, justification, company law, duty of care, duty of loyalty.

ЛИТЕРАТУРА:

  • Alces, K.A., The Fiduciary Gap, Journal of Corporation Law, Vol. 40, 2015.
  • Alces, K.A., Debunking the Corporate Fiduciary Myth, Journal of Corporation Law, No. 2/2009.
  • Baird, D.G., Henderson, M.T., Other People’s Money, Stanford Law Review, No. 5/2008.
  • Beuerle, C.G., Schuster, E.P., The Evolving Structure of Directors’ Duties in Europe, European Business Organization Law Review, No. 2/2014.
  • Beuerle, C.G., Paech, P., Schuster, E.P., Study on Directors’ Duties and Liabilities, London, 2013.
  • Brudney, V., Contract and Fiduciary Duty in Corporate Law, Boston College Law Review, Vol. 38, 1997.
  • Easterbrook, F., Fischel, D., Contract and Fiduciary Duty, The Journal of Law & Economics, No. 1/1993.
  • Fleischer, H., Legal Transplants in European Company Law – The Case of Fiduciary Duties, European Company & Financial Law Review, No. 3/2005.
  • Frankel, T., Fiduciary Law, New York, 2011.
  • Grundmann, S., European Company Law, Cambridge, Antwerp, Portland, 2012.
  • Kasolowsky, B., Fiduciary Duties in Company Law – Theory and Practice, Baden-Baden, 2002.
  • Lepetić, J., Kompanijsko pravni režim sukoba interesa – dužnost lojalnosti, Belgrade, 2015.
  • Mihajlović, B., Posebne dužnosti direktora prema društvu sa ograničenom odgovornošću i načelo slobode ugovaranja, Harmonius, No. 1/2015.
  • Miller, P., A Theory of Fiduciary Liability, Mc Gill Law Yournal, No. 2/2011.
  • Miller, P., Justifying fiduciary duties, McGill Law Yournal, No. 4/2013.
  • Radović, V., Uticaj agencijskih problema na pravo akcionarskih društava i korporativno upravljanje, in: Korporativno upravljanje, Pravni fakultet, Univerzitet u Beogradu, Beograd, 2008.
  • Ribstein, L., Are Partners Fiduciaries?, University of Illinois Law Review, 2005.
  • Sealy, L. S., Fiduciary Relationships, Cambridge Law Yournal, No. 1/1962.
  • Shepherd, J.C., The Law of Fiduciaries, Toronto, 1981.
  • Smith, G., The Critical Resource Theory of Fiduciary Duty, Vanderbilt Law Review, Vol. 55, 2002.
  • Stout, L.A., On the Export of U.S. – Style Corporate Fiduciary Duties to Other Cultures: Can a Transplant Take?, University of California, Los Angeles, Research Paper Series, Research Paper No. 02-11.
  • Strine, L.E.Jr., Hamermesh, L.A., Balloti, R.F., Gorris, J.M., Loyalty’s Core Demand: The Defining Role of Good Faith in Corporation Law, Georgetown Law Journal, No. 3/2010.
  • Vasiljević, M., Kompanijsko pravo – pravo privrednih društava, Belgrade, 2013.