Наслеђе 48 (2021), стр. 25-35

АУТОР(И): Ivana R. Trbojević Milošević

Е-АДРЕСА: i.trbojevic@fil.bg.ac.rs

Download Full Pdf   

DOI: 10.46793/NasKg2148.025TM


The paper is a reflection on the debate concerning the relation between (epistemic) modality and evidentiality. It cuts across different views and approaches to epistemic modality and evidentiality, bringing in, as a differentiating agent, the criterion of (inter)subjectivity. Starting from Lyons’ (1977) and Palmer’s (1986, 2001) concept of subjectivity as “the locutionary agent’s expression of himself and his own attitudes and beliefs” that is inherent in epistemic modality, the paper looks into Traugott’s use of the term (Traugott 1989, 2001) that understands and sees subjectivity as the way in which a speaker’s psychological or emotional perspective is incorporated into the description of a situation or event, and moves on to Nuyts (2001a, 2001b) for whom (inter)subjectivity indicates that the speaker has access to the situation-relevant evidence. The difference in approaches to the notion  of subjectivity is inextricably related to the changed views on the status of evidentiality within (or, rather without) epistemic modality.


epistemic modality, evidentiality, intersubjectivity, subjectivity


Aikhenvald 2004: A. Aikhenvald, Evidentiality, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Bybee et al. 1994: J. Bybee R. Perkins, W. Pagliuca, The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Bybee, Fleischman 1995a: J.L. Bybee, S. Fleischman (eds.) Modality in Grammar and Discourse, Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Bybee 1995b: J. L. Bybee, The semantic development of past tense modals in English, in: J. Bybee, S Fleischman (eds.), 503–517.

Boye 2012: K. Boye, Epistemic Meaning: A cross-linguistic and functional-cognitive study, Studies in Language, 37 (2). Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 43]

Carnap 1956: R. Carnap, Meaning and Necessity, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Chafe, Nichols 1986: W. Chafe, J. Nichols (eds), Evidentialty: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, Ablex Publishing.

Cornillie 2009: B. Cornillie, Evidentiality and Epistemic Modality, Functions of Language, 16, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, p. 1.

De Haan 2002: F. De Haan, The Relation between Modality and Evidentiality, Lin- guistiche Berichte, 9, 201-16.

Drubig 2001: H. B. Drubig, On the syntactic form of epistemic modality, Unpublished manuscript, University of Tuebingen.

Finegan 1995: E. Finegan, Subjectivity and subjectification: an introduction, in: Subjectivity and Subjectification in Language, D. Stein and S. Wright, eds., Cam- bridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–15.

Halliday 1970: M.A.K. Halliday, Language Structure and Language Function, In Lyons, J., (ed.), New Horizons in Linguistics, Penguin: Harmondsworth, 140–165.

Jespersen 1924-1958: O. Jespersen, The Philosophy of Grammar, London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.

Kiefer 1987: F. Kiefer, On defining Modality, Folia Linguistica, XXI/1, 67–94. Larreya, Riviére 1999: R. Larreya, C. Riviére, Grammaire explicative de l’anglais.

Nouvelle edition, London: Longman.

Lewis 1918: C.I. Lewis, A Survey of Symbolic Logic Via Internet Archive. Republished in part by Dover 1960.

Lyons 1977: J. Lyons, Semantics, 2. vol., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Nuyts 2001a: J. Nuyts, Epistemic modality, language, and conceptualization: a cognitive-pragmatic Perspective, John Benjamins.

Nuyts 2001b: J. Nuyts, Subjectivity as an evidential dimension in epistemic modal expressions, Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 383–400.

Nuyts 2012: J. Nuyts, Notions of (Inter)Subjectivity, English Text Construction, 5, 53–76.

Palmer 1979: F.R. Palmer, Modality and the English Modals, London and New York: Longman.

Palmer 1986: F. R. Palmer, Mood and modality (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Palmer 2001: F. R. Palmer, Mood and modality (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics), 2nd ed, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Papafragou 2006: A. Papafragou, Epistemic modality and truth conditions, Lingua 116, 1688-1702.

Plungian 2001: V. Plungian, The place of evidentiality within the universal grammatical space, Journal of Pragmatics 33, 349–357.

Popović 2010: Lj. Popović, Kategorija evidencijalnosti u srpskom i ukrajinskom jeziku, Zbornik matice srpske za slavistiku, 77, 17–47.

Recanati 2004: F. Recanati, Literal Meaning, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Simon-Vandenbergen, Aijmer 2007: A.M. Simon-Vandenbergen, K. Aijmer, The Semantic Field of Modal Certainty: a corpus based study of modal adverbs, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Stevanović 1979: M. Stevanović, Savremeni srpskohrvatski jezik II. Sintaksa, Beograd: Naučna knjiga.

Timberlake 1987: A. Timberlake, Mood and modality, in: Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Second edition. Volume III: Grammatical Categorie- sand the Lexicon, Timothy Shopen ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Timberlake 2007: A. Timberlake, Aspect, tense, mood, in: Shopen, T. (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Volume III: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, 2nd ed, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 280–333.

Traugott 1989: E. Traugott, On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: an example of subjectification in semantic change, Language 65, 31–55.

Traugott, Dashner 2002: E. Traugott, R. Dasher, Regularity in semantic change, Cam- bridge: Cambridge University Press.

Traugott 2010: E.C. Traugott. (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reas- sessment, in: Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

Trbojević Milošević 2004: I. Trbojević Milošević, Modalnost, sud, iskaz [Modality, Judgment, Utterance]. Beograd: Filološki fakultet.

Trbojević Milošević 2018: I. Trbojević Milošević, Corpus Evidence for Evidentials in English and Serbian Political Interviews, Belgrade English Language and Lit- erature Studies, 10, 131–155.

Auwera, Plungian 1998: J. Van der Auwera, V. Plungian, Modality’s semantic map, Linguistic Typology, Volume 2, 79–124.

Verstraete 2001: J. Verstraete, Subjective and objective modality: interpersonal and ideational functions in the English modal auxiliary system, Journal of Prag- matics, 33, 1505–1528.

Von Wright 1951: G.H. Von Wright, Deontic Logic, in: Mind Vol. 62, No. 237, 1–15.