Uzdanica XXII I (2025) (str. 197-211)
AUTOR(I) / AUTHOR(S): Milica M. Kočović Pajević
DOI: 10.46793/Uzdanica22.1.197K
SAŽETAK / ABSTRACT:
The paper explores the evaluation of an English for Specific Purposes (ESP) textbook, focusing on tertiary-level psychology students. The study emphasizes the importance of selecting appropriate materials that align with learners’ professional needs. Using a Likert scale-based evaluation questionnaire, this study assesses English for Psychology in Higher Education Studies, analyzing criteria such as physical appearance, topics, language skills, activities, and motivation. The results show that students value the book’s topical relevance and vocabulary but identify a lack of listening and writing tasks, as well as insufficient grammar exercises. The findings imply the need for better integration of interactive elements and a more balanced approach to language skills. Some implications and recommendations from the study focus on improvements in textbook content, including more independent learning features and contemporary teaching strategies to enhance student engagement and meet professional needs. The study acknowledges certain limitations, including the small sample size and the absence of activities targeting specific language skills, and offers recommendations for future improvements in textbook design. Given these constraints and the exploratory nature of the research, further studies are needed to gain more comprehensive insights into the evaluation of ESP textbooks in tertiary education.
KLJUČNE REČI / KEYWORDS:
ESP, textbook evaluation, tertiary education, psychology students, ELT.
LITERATURA / REFERENCES:
- Ahmad, J. (2012). English for specific purposes: Its definition, characteristics, scope, and purpose. European Journal of Scientific Research, 71(3), 495–499.
- Ahmadi, A., & Derakhshan, A. (2016). EFL teachers’ perceptions towards textbook evaluation. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(2), 260–267.
- Allwright, D. (1981). What do we want teaching materials for? English Language Teaching Journal, 36(1), 5–18.
- Anthony, L. (2018). Introducing English for specific purposes. London: Routledge.
- Atigh, R., & Khabbazi, S. (2021). The evaluation of ESP textbooks based on students’ perspectives. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 4(5), 56–62.
- Basta, J. (2012). Engleski jezik struke u visokom školstvu. U: B. Dimitrijević (ur.), Filologija i univerzitet (str. 787–802). Niš: Filozofski fakultet Univerziteta u Nišu.
- Basturkmen, H. (2010). Developing courses in English for specific purposes. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Belcher, D. D. (2006). English for Specific Purposes: Teaching to perceived needs and imagined futures in worlds of work, study, and everyday life. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 133–156.
- Bytyqi, B. (2017). The importance of materials development in teaching English for specific purposes. New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(5), 104–110. https://doi.org/10.18844/prosoc.v3i5.2010
- Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing your coursebook. London: Heinemann.
- Dudley-Evans, T., & St. John, M. J. (1998). Developments in ESP: A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Enesi, M., Vrapi, F., & Trifoni, A. (2021). Challenges of teaching and learning English language for ESP courses. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 11(1), 213–226.
- Fernández Dobao, A. (2014). Vocabulary learning in collaborative tasks: A comparison of pair and small group work. Language Teaching Research, 18(4), 497–520. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168813519730
- Graves, K., & Gudwin, C. (2011). Evaluating and selecting EFL teaching materials. In N. Harwood (Ed.), English language teaching materials: Theory and practice (pp.
- 77‒97). Cambridge University Press.
- Grubor, J. (2023). Kooperativno učenje u nastavi jezika i književnosti. Folia Linguistica et Litteraria, 45(7), 125‒146.
- Gu, H., & Ren, L. (2019). Developing ESP teaching materials based on the analysis of information engineering majors’ needs. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 7(10), 121–131.
- Hadi, S., & Khadivar, Z. (2015). Evaluation of an ESP medical textbook: Instructors’ and learners’ perceptions in focus. International Education Studies, 8(7), 97–104. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n7p97
- Harbi, A. A. M. (2017). Evaluation study for secondary stage EFL textbook: EFL Teachers’ Perspectives. English Language Teaching, 10(3), 26–39.
- Hutchinson, T., & Torres, E. (1994). The textbook as agent of change. ELT Journal, 48(4), 315–328.
- Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes: A learningcentred approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Igrutinović, S. (2012). Selekcija materijala za engleski jezik mašinske struke u okviru ESP porodice. IMK–14 – Istraživanje i razvoj, 18(4), 129–132.
- Karimnia, A., & Jafari, F. M. (2017). Critical ESP textbook evaluation: The case of visual arts textbook. Sustainable Multilingualism, 11(1), 219–236.
- Koltai, A. (2018). Understanding learner needs: A qualitative study of ESP learner needs in EU English courses in Hungarian tertiary education. Doctoral dissertation. Budapest: Eötvös Loránd University, Faculty of Education and Psychology.
- Litz, D. R. A. (2005). Textbook evaluation and ELT management: A South Korean case study. Asian EFL Journal, 48(1), 1–53.
- Lourido-Badía, I. (2023). Analysis of English for Specific Purposes materials:
- Sports sciences and psychology ESP materials in the EFL classroom. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 11(3), 777–792. https://doi.org/10.22190/ JTESAP231018058L
- McDonough, J., & Shaw, C. (2003). Materials and methods in ELT: A teacher’s guide (2nd ed.). Malden: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
- McGrath, I. (2013). Teaching materials and the roles of EFL/ESL teachers: Practice and theory. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
- McGrath, I. (2002). Materials evaluation and design for language teaching. Edinburg: Edinburg University Press.
- Mishan, F. (2022). The global ELT coursebook: A case of Cinderella’s slipper? Language Teaching, 55(4), 490–505.
- Mohammadi, M., & Abdi, H. (2014). Textbook evaluation: A case study. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1148–1155.
- Nunan, D. (1988). The learner-centered curriculum. Cambridge University Press.
- O’Neill, R. (1982). Why use textbooks? ELT Journal, 36(2), 104–111.
- Räisänen, C. A., & Fortanet-Gómez, I. (2008). The state of ESP teaching and learning in Western European higher education after Bologna. In C. A. Räisänen & Fortanet-Gómez (Eds.), ESP in European higher education: Integrating language and content (pp. 11–51). AILA Applied Linguistics, 4. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
- Richards, J. C. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Robinson, P. (1991). ESP today: A practitione’s guide. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
- Sari, L. I., & Sari, R. H. (2020). ESP coursebook evaluation from the perspectives of teachers, cadets, and graduates: The case of Maritime English. In Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, vol. 434 (pp. 56–60). Atlantis Press.
- Sari, Y. I., & Sari, A. (2019). An analysis of the content of ESP textbooks used in vocational high schools. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(1), 21–29.
- Sheldon, L. (1988). Evaluating ELT textbooks and materials. ELT Journal, 42(2), 237–246.
- Skierso, A. (1991). Textbook selection and evaluation. In: M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language (pp. 432–453). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
- Strevens, P. (1988). ESP after twenty years: A re-appraisal. In M. Tickoo (Ed.), ESP: State of the art (pp. 1‒13). Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.
- Takrousta, M., Behrouzi, P., & Kolahi, S. (2020). Evaluating an ESP textbook:
- A case study of English for banking purposes at EDBI. Revista Tempos E Espaços Em Educação, 13(32), 1–16.
- Tomlinson, B. (2013). Developing materials for language teaching (2nd ed.). London: Bloomsbury.
- Tomlinson, B. (2012). Materials development for language learning and teaching. Language Teaching, 45(2), 1–37.
- Tran, N. D., Pham, H., & Nghiem, T. T. H. (2020). Pair work and small group activities: Good ways to improve students’ oral interaction times and make students more confident in blended learning classes. Journal of Language and Life, 305, 144–150.