„Primus universalis“ u zvaničnim dokumentima Međunarodne komisije za bogoslovski dijalog rimokatoličke i pravoslavne Crkve: recepcija i izazovi

Sabornost XVII (2023)  (str. 75-111)

AUTOR(I) / AUTHOR(S): Nebojša Stevanović

E-ADRESA / E-MAIL: nstevanovic.17005@bfspc.bg.ac.rs

Download Full Pdf  

DOI: 10.46793/sabornost23.075S

SAŽETAK / ABSTRACT:

Suštinska ideja rada ogleda se u pružanju odgovora na pitanje mesta i prirode primus universalis u okvirima zvaničnih dokumenata Međunarodne komisije za bogoslovski dijalog rimokatoličke i pravoslavne Crkve. Na tim osnovama, u cilju utvrđivanja zacrtanog primacijalnog kursa, dalji tok rada je nastavljen govorom o izazovima i recepciji bazičnih eklisijalnih postavki primus universalis, pri čemu je ovaj deo rada podeljen u dva pravca: prvi, projavljen u smeru recepcije u okvirima Stava Moskovske patrijaršije po pitanju prirode univerzalnog prvog, te drugi, odgovora mitropolita Elpidofora Lambriniadisa. Različitost i suprotstavljenost, ali i sapostojanje, dva modela u okvirima pravoslavne eklisiologije prikazana je i primerom ponovnog prečitavanja ovog pitanja u sistematskom bogoslovlju, gde su izneti stavovi brojnih teologa iste Crkve, čija analiza potvrđuje sapostojanje dvostrukog tumačenja primus universalis, izraženo, uopšteno, u dijalektici ’esse — bene esse Ecclesia’.

KLJUČNE REČI / KEYWORDS:

primus universalis, Međunarodna komisija za bogoslovski dijalog rimokatoličke i pravoslavne Crkve, uporedna eklisiologija, uporedna trijadologija, primacijalna teologija

LITERATURA / REFERENCES:

  • Alfejev, I. (2005). Tajna vere — Uvod u pravoslavno dogmatsko bogoslovlje. Kraljevo: Eparhija žička.
  • Afanasijev, N. (1989). Crkva predsedavajuća u ljubavi. U J. Majendorf (ur.), Primat apostola Petra — stanovište pravoslavne Crkve (str. 45–87). Kragujevac: Kalenić.
  • Ver, K. (2022). Ravenski dokument i budućnost pravoslavno-katoličkog dijaloga. Sabornost, 16, 157–178.
  • Zizijulas, J. (1997). Jedinstvo Crkve u Svetoj Evharistiji i u episkopu u prva tri veka. Novi Sad: Beseda.
  • Zizijulas, J. (2000). Institucija sabora. Sabornost, 1–2/VI, 27–55.
  • Zizijulas, J. (2014). Ekumenizam — Ogledi iz ekumenskog bogoslovlja. Požarevac: Odbor za prosvetu i kulturu Eparhije braničevske.
  • Majendorf, J. (2008). Živo predanje. Kragujevac: Kalenić.
  • Matić, Z. (2018). Primat rimskog episkopa u delu Ž.-M.R. Tijara: mogućnost recepcije Tijarove teologije primata u dijalogu Pravoslavne i Rimokatoličke Crkve. Požarevac: Odbor za prosvetu i kulturu Eparhije požarevačko-braničevske.
  • Midić, I. (2021). Jedna i mnoge Crkve i problem njihovog jedinstva – teološki pristup. Požarevac: Odbor za prosvetu i kulturu Eparhije požarevačko-braničevske.
  • Perišić, V. (2012). Ignjatije Antiohijski — episkop–mučenik–bogonosac. Beograd: Insitut za Teološka istraživanja Pravoslavnog bogoslovskog fakulteta.
  • Šiškov, A. (2014). „Pervenstvo v Cerkvi v bogoslovii mitropolita pergamskogo Ioanna (Ziziulasa)”. Vestnik Russko hristianskoй gumanitarnoй akademii, 15(1), 30–40.
  • Alfeyev, H. (2011). Orthodox Christianity, Volume I — The History and Canonical Structure of the Orthodox Church. New York: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press.
  • Asproulis, N. (2016). Primacy and Synodality: An Essay Review of Contemporary Theological Literature. U J. Chryssavgis (ur.), Primacy in the Church — The Office of Primate and the Authority of Councils, Vol. I (str. 309–333). New York: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 2016.
  • Behr, J. (2013). Trinitarian Being of the Church. St. Vladimir’s Theological Quarterly, 48(1), 67–88.
  • Benz, E. (2017). The Eastern Orthodox Church — It’s Thought and Life. New York: Routledge.
  • Bujak, J. (2021). The Teaching of Pope Francis About Synodality in the Context of Contemporary Theological and Ecumenical reflection. Collectanae theological, 91(5), 147–173.
  • Bulgakov, S. (1988). The Orthodox Church. New York: Crestwood.
  • Buttigieg, D. (2020). Receptive Hermeneutics in the Dialogue Between Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox Christians: New Approaches. PhD Thesis, University of Malta.
  • Coppa, F. (ur.) (1999). Encyclopedia of the Vatican and Papacy. London: Greenwood Press.
  • Daley, B. (2016). The Meaning and Exercise of ’Primaces of Honor’ in the Early Church. U J. Chryssavgis (ur.), Primacy in the Church — The Office of Primate and the Authority of Councils, Vol. I, (str. 35–51). New York: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press.
  • Denysenko, N. (2013). Primacy, Synodality and Collegiality in Orthodoxy: A Liturgical Model. Journal of Ecumenical Studies, 48(1), 20–44.
  • Evans, R. (1994). The Church and the Churches — Towards on Ecumenical Ecclesiology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hovorun, C. (2015). Meta-Ecclesiology — Chronicles on Church Awakeness. New York: MacMillian.
  • Hovorun, C. (2016). Does Primacy Belongs to the Nature of the Church. U J. Chryssavgis (ur.), Primacy in the Church — The Office of Primate and the Authority of Councils, Vol. 2, (str. 511–531). New York: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press.
  • Hovorun, C. (2017). Scaffold of the Church — Towards Poststructural Ecclesiology. Cambridge: James Clark & Co.
  • Hunt, A. (2013). The Trinitarian Depths of Vatican II. Theological Studies, 74, 3–19.
  • Kallistos of Diokleia. (2018). Catholic–Orthodox Relations Following the Holy and Great Council in Crete (2016). Centro pro Unione Bulletin, 93, 20–28.
  • Kasper, W. (2005). That May All Be One — The Call to Unity Today. London: Burns & Oates.
  • Kerr, F. (2007). Twentieth Century Catholic Theologians — From Neoscholastism to Nuptial Mysticsm. Oxford: Black Well Publishing.
  • Ludovikos, N. (2020). Christological or Analogical Primacy: Ecclesial Unity and Universal Primacy in the Orthodox Church. The Pemptousia Journal for Theological Studies, 10, 127–143.
  • Manoussakis, J. (2016). Primacy and the Holy Trinity: Ecclesiology and Theology in Dialogue. U J. Chryssavgis (ur.), Primacy in the Church — The Office of Primate and the Authority of Councils, Vol. 2, (str. 120–136). New York: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press.
  • McPartlan, P. (2018). Chieti and the Trajectory of Catholic–Orthodox Dialogue. Centro pro Unione, 94, 3–10.
  • Meyendorff, J. (1992). St. Peter in Byzantian Theology. U J. Meyendorff (ur.), The Primacy of Peter — Essay in Ecclesiology and the Early Christian, (str. 67–91). New York: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press.
  • Nedungatt, G. (2010). The Council in Trullo Revisited: Ecumenism and the Canon of the Council. Theological Studies, 71, 651–676.
  • Petscu, C. (2014). The Theological Premise and Canonical Consequences of Church Synodality as Reflected in the Ravenna Document. International Journal of Orthodox Theology, 5(2), 59–74.
  • Schmemann, A. (1992). The Idea of Primacy in Orthodox Ecclesiology. U J. Meyendorff (ur.), The Primacy of Peter — Essay in Ecclesiology and the Early Christian, (str. 145–173). NY Crestwood: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press.
  • Siecienski, E. (2017). The Papacy and the Orthodox. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Vasiljević, M. (2016). Reflections on Authority and Synodality: A Eucharistic, Relational and Eschatological Perspective. U J. Chryssavgis (ur.), Primacy in the Church — The Office of Primate and the Authority of Councils, Vol. 2, (str. 531–555). New York: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press.
  • Vassiliadis, P. (2003). Eucharist and Witness — Orthodox Perspective on the Unity and Mission of the Church. Geneva: WCC Publication.
  • Vgenopoulos, M. (2016). Primacy in Orthodox Theology: Past and Present. U J. Chryssavgis (ur.), Primacy in the Church — The Office of Primate and the Authority of Councils, Vol. I, (str. 239–261). New York: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press.
  • Ware, T. (1964). The Orthodox Church. Baltimore: Penguin Books.
  • Zizioulas, J. (2010). The One and the Many: Studies on God, Man, the Church, and the World Today. Alhambra: Sebastian Press.