DESIGNING CURRICULUM CONTENT AS A FACTOR OF EDUCATION QUALITY

Узданица XVII 1 (2020), (стр. 261-271)

АУТОР(И): Emina M. Kopas-Vukašinović, Vera M. Savić

Е-АДРЕСА: emina.kopas@pefja.kg.ac.rs

Download Full Pdf 

DOI: 10.18485/uzdanica.2020.17.1.16

САЖЕТАК:

Designing curriculum content includes the development of modern strategies for teaching and learning in the context of developing an individual’s ability to think, explore, learn through activity and express own creative potentials. The aim of the paper was to determine whether student teachers recognize the importance of designing teaching contents (DTC) in the educational process. The data was collected through a focus group interview with student teachers of master studies at the Faculty of Education, University of Kragujevac, Jagodina (Serbia). The student teachers’ views on the quality of university teaching clearly point to their need and willingness to design curriculum content for more efficient teaching, and stress the significance of DTC for enhancing the quality of education.

КЉУЧНЕ РЕЧИ:

cooperative learning, thematic linking of contents, appropriate feedback, standards in higher education, knowledge management system

ЛИТЕРАТУРА:

  • Artelt, Baumert, McElvany, Peschar (2003): Cordula Artelt, Jurgen Baumert, Nele McElvany, Julijen L. Peschar, Learners for Life: Student Approaches to Learning, Results from PISA 2000, OECD, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved in January 2019 from https://www.oecd.org/edu/school/programmeforinternation–
    alstudentassessmentpisa/33690476.pdf
  • Desinan (2011). Claudio Desinan, Current teaching and learning strategies, In: Vladimir Kadum (Ed.), Suvremene strategije učenja i poučavanja, Pula: Univerzitet Jurja Dobrile, 583‒590.
  • Ellis, Read (2015). Gail Ellis, Carol Read, Course Design and Evaluation in Primary Teacher Education, In: Christiana Nicole Giannikas, Lou McLaughlin, Gemma Fanning, Nellie Deutsch Muller (Eds.), Teaching Children English: from research to practice, Reading: Garnet Publishing Ltd, 115‒135.
  • Gordon (2008): Tomas Gordon, Kako biti uspešan nastavnik, Beograd: Kreativni centar.
  • Hattie (2015): John Hattie, The Applicability of Visible Learning to Higher Education, Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 1 (1), 79‒91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/stl0000021
  • Hébert, Hartley (2006): Yvonne Hébert, William J. Hartley, Personalised Learning and Changing Conceptions of Childhood and Youth, In: Schooling for Tomorrow: Personalising Education, Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) & Centre for Educational Research and Innovation (CERI), 63‒73. Retrieved on March 13, 2018 from http://www.oecd-library.org/education/personalising-education_9789264036604-en.
  • Kopas-Vukašinović (2014): Emina Kopas-Vukašinović, Student Initiative in the Classroom as a Prerequisite for the Development of University Education System, In: Tibor J. Karlovitz (Ed.), Some Current Issues in Pedagogy, Komarno: International Research Institute, 37‒50.
  • Kopas-Vukašinović, Golubović-Ilić (2017): Emina Kopas-Vukašinović, Irena
    Golubović-Ilić, Attitudes of Students about the Effects of Ambient Teaching, In: Silva Bratož (Ed.), Dimensins of Contemporary Learning Environments, Koper (Slovenia): University of Primorska, Faculty of Education, 253‒266.
  • McLaughlin (2012): Lou McLaughlin, Young Learner Teacher Cognition and
    Teacher Training, International House Journal of Education and Development, 33, n.p. Retrieved on March 13, 2018 from http://ihjournal.com/young-learner-teacher-cognition-and-teacher-training-by-lou-mclaughlin.
  • Milovanović, Kopas-Vukašinović (2014): Radmila Milovanović, Emina Kopas-Vukašinović, Percepcije kreativnosti i kreativni potencijali budućih vaspitača i učitelja, Zbornik Instituta za pedagoška istraživanja, 46 (1), 181‒199. DOI: 10.2298/ZIPI1401181M
  • Mirkov (2013): Snežana Mirkov, Učenje – zašto i kako: pristupi u proučavanju činilaca koji deluju na učenje, Beograd: Institut za pedagoška istraživanja.
  • Savić (2012): Vera Savić, Razvoj modula Engleski jezik ‒ Metodika nastave engleskog jezika na mlađem uzrastu: izazovi i perspektive, U: Ilijana Čutura, Vesna Trifunović (ur.), Škola kao činilac razvoja nacionalnog i kulturnog identiteta i proevropskih vrednosti, tom II, Jagodina: Pedagoški fakultet u Jagodini, 483‒498.
  • Spasić, Juranić, Jelić, Bošnjak, Rakonjac (2000): Žarko Spasić, Ivan Juranić, Miloš Jelić, Srđan Bošnjak, Ivan Rakonjac, Podizanje kvaliteta nastave i istraživanja, Beograd: Zajednica univerziteta Srbije. Retrieved on June 5, 2019, from http://www.chem.bg.ac.rs/~ijuranic/QualityEnh.pdf.
  • Standardi i smjernice za osiguranje kvaliteta u Evropskom području visokog obrazovanja (2005): Helsinki: Evropsko udruženje za osiguranje kvaliteta u visokom obrazovanju.
    http://www.enqa.eu/indirme/esg/ESG_loc.pdf.
  • The Bologna Process 2020 – The European Higher Education Area in the New Decade (2009): Communique of the conference of European ministers responsible for higher education, Leuven and Louvain-la-Neuve, 28–29 April 2009. https://www.eurashe.eu/library/modernising-phe/Bologna_2009_Leuven-Communique.pdf
  • UNESCO (2004): Changing Teaching Practices, Using Curriculum Differentiation to Respond to Students’ Diversity, Paris: the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Retrieved on March 13, 2018 from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001365/136583e.pdf